JamesBHess wrote:While I don't agree with the opening paragraph or that Louisville "is content to hang just under the radar," the article gives a fair description of what Louisville is about compared to the GQ blunder of a few months ago.
Heather Y wrote:My pilates studio carries Garden and Gun in their magazine collection, and I was just looking at the spread about half an hour ago! The only thing I did not care for was glorifying Fourth Street live in the opening of the article.
Robin Garr wrote:I've got to ask, though: GARDEN and GUN!?
Who in the hell is the target demographic for that magazine?
Steve A wrote:2. One of these things is not like the other.
Robin Garr wrote:Sounds great! Good work by Pableaux (except maybe for his failure to keep that 4SL thang quiet).
I've got to ask, though: GARDEN and GUN!?
Who in the hell is the target demographic for that magazine?
Deb Hall wrote:BTW, Robin, I think the target market is folks a la Owsley Brown Frazier - blue-blood Southern with cash.
Mark Head wrote:Never heard of it and it's certainly not what I expected. It sounded more like "Grit Magazine".
Robin Garr wrote:(More seriously, I see it's based in Charleston, which is certainly Southern but maybe not as typical of the usual stereotypes as some Southern cities.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests