Rob Coffey wrote:There is nothing to be clarified. The term Jim Crow refers to a set of racist laws. I think both Robin and I oppose those laws, I dont see what Robin's problem is.
The laws followed the custom and the culture, institutionalized prejudice that continued for about 100 years after the Civil War with the full support of most of the people.
Jim Crow wasn't a practice forced by law upon white southerners who would have preferred to be diverse and inclusive. It reflected their long-standing bigotry, a bigotry that was given biblical support and preached from the pulpits of Bible Belt churches.
It took the conscience of the greater nation, support from the federal government and the National Guard, years of protests, thousands of beatings and hundreds of deaths before Jim Crow was finally legally ousted by legislation in the form of the Civil Rights Acts, plural.
To suggest that Jim Crow - meaning institutionalized racial segregation - would not have existed in the South if not for laws is simply inane.