John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
JustinHammond wrote:Unless your drunk or carrying drugs the checkpoint isn't going to be a problem. I think/know they consist of what Steve said happened to him. The cops ask if you have been drinking and you answer,look, and smell fine and go on your way. I don't see that as an invasion of privacy. Going through airport security is more of an invasion of privacy to me than a checkpoint.
t
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
Steve P wrote:John,
WHOA !!! So what's that mean in simple language ?
John Hagan wrote:JustinHammond wrote:Unless your drunk or carrying drugs the checkpoint isn't going to be a problem. I think/know they consist of what Steve said happened to him. The cops ask if you have been drinking and you answer,look, and smell fine and go on your way. I don't see that as an invasion of privacy. Going through airport security is more of an invasion of privacy to me than a checkpoint.
t
OK, taking your point and what Nimbus had said earlier about
"Your "right" to drive goes away when you get drunk. And your right to drive is totally trumped by my right to life...." what is different about the cops walking up to you on the street and asking you for a urine sample and checking you for guns and weapons? Is it Ok to have your rights violated just so I can feel more safe knowing your not high and carrying a gun? After all, if your not high and you dont have an illegal weapon,whats the problem?
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
JustinHammond wrote:If I'm just walking down the street and carrying a gun while high or drunk the odds of me accidentally killing someone are far less than driving while drunk.
Sounds like another conversation to be had over beers at BBC. I just hope there is not a roadblock set up downtown.
John Hagan wrote:JustinHammond wrote:If I'm just walking down the street and carrying a gun while high or drunk the odds of me accidentally killing someone are far less than driving while drunk.
Sounds like another conversation to be had over beers at BBC. I just hope there is not a roadblock set up downtown.
So were going to decide how many exceptions to the forth amendment can be made based on "odds" of people getting hurt? I have been to several neighborhoods where the "odds" of getting shanked or shot are pretty good,compared to other areas. I dont think my desire to feel safe in those areas should be a reason for warrant less searches. My point here is that playing around with our rights is a slippery slope.
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
Nimbus Couzin wrote:Here's raw news video of my dead friend's car after his crash http://www.wlky.com/video/20991371/index.html . Watch it. Thankfully, nobody else was hurt. It is all about balancing rights. Your right not to be inconvenienced doesn't trump my right to live.
Carla G wrote:I think if the police really wanted to be difficult Steve still could have gotten a ticket for the root beer. If I remember right, the law states drinking and driving but doesn't specify alcohol. So drinking ANYTHING while driving is against the law. Good thing Steve was his charming self huh?
Carla G wrote:Good thing Steve was his charming self huh?
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot and 0 guests