Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

LEO's Eat'N'Blog: We like smut. It's good.

by Robin Garr » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:22 am

<table border="0" align="right" width="310"><tr><td><img src="http://www.louisvillehotbytes.com/ucan.jpg" border="1" align="right"></td></tr><tr><td>After a brief hiatus, former Mayan Gypsy chef Bruce Ucan is back at it with Mayan Café, in the East Market location where Mayan Gypsy started out. LEO Photo by Nicole Pullen</td></tr></table>LEO's Eat 'n' Blog with Louisville HotBytes
(Mayan Café)

Smut. Corn smut. It's a nasty name for a nasty-looking thing, a black, disgusting fungus that turns corn kernels into swollen gray blobs that look like an alien mutation, a sight so gross that the ancient Aztecs named the stuff "cuitlacoche" or, literally, well, "black turds."

Although cuitlacoche may look like something the dog dragged in, it tastes really, really good. So, while North American farmers curse and destroy smut-afflicted corn, Mexican growers are more inclined to praise Lord Quetzalcoatl, peel off the pillowy black fungus and serve it for lunch. Or put some in cans and ship it north to savvy restaurateurs.

Selling it to Anglos can be a challenge, though, so the few eateries around the United States that serve cuitlacoche (pronounced "wheat-la-COH-chay") generally describe it with more appetizing euphemisms. "Mexican caviar," for instance. Or, at Louisville's excellent M<b>ayan Café</b>, "exotic mushroom," appended to the Aztec "cuitlacoche" without the literal translation.

Mayan Café chef Bruce Ucán prepares cuitlacoche in a dreamily accessible fashion, pureed into a silken, sweet cream sauce that showcases its delicate, sweet and subtly mushroomy aroma and flavor.

Full reports in LEO and on LouisvilleHotBytes.
no avatar
User

Brian Curl

by Brian Curl » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:47 am

Sounds very good and unique, will have to check it out!
no avatar
User

Deb Hall

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

4169

Joined

Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm

Location

Highlands , Louisville

by Deb Hall » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:22 pm

Robin,

Got to be one of your best titles ever! (Of course that tells you what kind of mind I have...)

Really informative article: that was a new one on me...

Deb
no avatar
User

GaryF

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

2006

Joined

Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:05 am

by GaryF » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:35 pm

It is the ugliest food I think I have ever eaten, but it's awfully good.
I've had it in enchiladas with smoked chicken and chipoltle and just saw a piece on TV where it was roasted with corn, tomatillos and onions.
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:55 am

I've always seen it spelled as huitlacoche.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:07 am

Ron Johnson wrote:I've always seen it spelled as huitlacoche.


You'll see it both ways, but Mayan Café uses the C version on its menu, and that version seems to have slightly greater weight of authenticity. Google a little and you'll see. (It's pronounced with the C silent, which adds to the confusion.)
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:19 am

ah, I figured it out. Huitlacoche is Aztec spelling and Cuitlacoche is Mayan.

Robin, you better make sure no Aztecs are around when you say that cuitlacoche is the more authentic spellling!
no avatar
User

Erin Riedel

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

143

Joined

Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:14 pm

Location

Germantown

by Erin Riedel » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:50 am

At the risk of totally putting people off of this food, I have to share the first time I ever heard of cuitlacoche (beware some slightly off-color language and general grossness). After reading that I thought that cuitlacoche would be one of the few foods that I would never have any interest in trying. But now that Robin has given me a much more appetizing perspective on it, I'm excited about trying it. I think normally-adventurous boyfriend is still a little skeptical, though. :)
no avatar
User

GaryF

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

2006

Joined

Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:05 am

by GaryF » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:08 pm

Erin Riedel wrote:At the risk of totally putting people off of this food, I have to share the first time I ever heard of cuitlacoche (beware some slightly off-color language and general grossness). After reading that I thought that cuitlacoche would be one of the few foods that I would never have any interest in trying. But now that Robin has given me a much more appetizing perspective on it, I'm excited about trying it. I think normally-adventurous boyfriend is still a little skeptical, though. :)


I never imagined it cames canned-I've only had fresh. I would think canning would damage the texture.
It's good to know that processing doesn't improve the appearance though. :)
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:29 pm

GaryF wrote:I never imagined it cames canned-I've only had fresh.


Most commercial product comes canned ... I doubt it travels well in fresh form. :P

To my recollection, Bruce Ucan usually purees it in a creamy sauce, which lets the nice truffly-sweet corn flavor through without troubling diners with having to look at the stuff ...
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:46 pm

I had it in a quesadilla once in NYC. It was plentiful, perhaps too much so.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Google [Bot] and 10 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign