Nimbus Couzin wrote:Paul Mick wrote:I would not drink it with a mouse, I would not drink it in a house. I do not like it James Dlugosch, I do not like Coors-in-Box. (nly, unlike Dr. Seuss' protagonist, I've actually tried the stuff. (sans-box)
Personally, I'm not opposed to the idea of beer in a box though. Provided they can keep the beer from going flat, and the materials are recyclable. It could actually save energy. However, my subsequent argument would have to be that growlers (glass 1/2 gallon bottles filled with beer from your local brew-pubs) are even more energy efficient and much greener, because they are 100% reusable and cut out the carbon footprint from shipping.JustinHammond wrote:"Despite what the microbrewers will tell you, all beer is pretty much the same. Consumers who pay a premium do so more for the experience than the taste."
My tastebuds and the microbrewers have been lying to me for years. Those bastards.
Hah, you're exactly right Justin. It makes me feel good that the comments on that blog in regards to the part about all beer being "pretty much the same" have been unilaterally scathing. I would throw in my two cents, but there are already more pages of comments than I care to read so I think the issue has been thoroughly addressed.
Justin quoted an amazing statement that needs to be refuted! " all beer is pretty much the same."
All beer is pretty much the same? What in the world do you know about beer? Apparently nothing!
Bzzzzt...Wrong ...go to jail, don't collect $200....
That statement is like saying all food is basically the same. But in reality some is excellent and awesome and some really sucks. No difference with beer. You can have bland adjunct filled lagers like bud light, or you can have tasty hand-crafted wonders like Stone IPA, or one of our local brews from New Albanian, or BBC, or cumberland or Brownings. The statement is like saying "all bread is basically the same."
Well, I dare you to eat a piece of wonder bread, and then try a piece of good whole grain bread from a German bakery )or Blue Dog locally. No comparison . Almost like apples and oranges...
rrrrrrrrr...
The person making the "all beers are the same argument" is someone who has bought into the "selling of the middle" marketing approach in America. Simply, it is easier to market objects as being different (when they are the same) then it is to actually market products that are actually different. Really, what's the difference between Miller Light and Bud Light? Instead of embracing difference settled through competition (the hallmark of free market capitalism), we've allowed ourselves to be seduced by 1) the perception of difference among that which is the same (Bud Light and Miller Light) and 2) the "othering" of that which is really different. The most clever way to do this, then, is to other the outsider (the microbrew) by saying "no really, it's just like ours." In other words, instead of highlighting its difference as unique (or even bad), you eliminate its difference by saying "it's the same." As creatures of habit, we like "same." Once you make that argument, the next argument is simple - the financial bottom line argument. "Why pay 8 bucks for a six of that, when you can get 24 of ours for 8.99."
Maybe this is a rant. Maybe I needed to get it off my chest.