Mark R. wrote:Robin, I think you're making an awful big generalization regarding dining preferences all the Blues' vs. the Reds'!
Brian Curl wrote:Just because folks live inside the Watterson does not mean that they do not dine inside the Watterson.
How outrageously flawed logic and innuendo.
Robin Garr wrote:True to some extent, although that brief flirtation with $4.50/gal gasoline had a marked impact on that habit for a lot of folks.
Mark Head wrote:Naw....we east enders just gas up the Hummer and go where ever we want. Unfortunately some of those "inside the Watterson" are self-deluded with a sense of being "hipper-than-thou". I'm sure it will play well in LEO.
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
Mark Head wrote:I personally don't agree with the broader generalizations in this article.
Matthew D wrote:Mark Head wrote:I personally don't agree with the broader generalizations in this article.
As Robin has already pointed out to some extent, the generalizations are doing certain rhetorical work in the article. You don't have to agree with them. What Robin has accomplished is not only speaking to the assumed audience (LEO leftists) but others who may be interested in the topic at hand (food people). Not only does he speak to both audiences but he constructs the audiences to serve his purpose, which is two-fold: to commend Seviche for its fine cuisine and to get people thinking about dining choices in Louisville. The generalizations are not meant to be agreed with or disagreed with (as no information is truly objective), but, instead, meant to start a conversation. Which is, well, what we have here.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefsbot, AmazonBot 2, Claudebot, YandexBot and 2 guests