Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

22998

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Robin Garr » Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:51 pm

LEO's Eats with Louisville HotBytes.com

What does fine dining have to do with politics? Consider this: The post-election map of the metro's voting precincts painted a telling picture of Jefferson County demographics in stark red and blue, and we're not talking Cardinals and Wildcats. Inside the Watterson, the city's liberal enclaves and African-American neighborhoods were solid Obama blue. The suburbs, in contrast, bled McCain red.

As a statistical generalization, the city and its suburbs are different, and that difference extends to dining preferences. There's a reason why the 'burbs are awash with chain dining while most of the independent local eateries that make Louisville weird are located in the People's Republics of the Highlands, Clifton and Crescent Hill, plus enclaves in and around downtown and St. Matthews.

So, while I was really sorry to learn that Chef Anthony Lamas was closing Seviche A Latin Bistro, his suburban operation on Goose Creek Road, after just under a year in business, I was not surprised.

Lamas attributed the decision to poor economic conditions, exacerbated by losses following Hurricane Ike and a kitchen fire last month. "I have done everything I could and have put all my passion in this restaurant, but it is not enough," he told the LouisvilleHotBytes forum.

I hated to see it go. Seviche is one of my favorite local restaurants, and Lamas ranks among the city's most talented chefs.

But I can't say I didn't see it coming, and I expect Lamas did, too.

Read the complete report in LEO and on LouisvilleHotBytes.

Seviche A Latin Restaurant
1538 Bardstown Road
473-8560
http://www.sevicherestaurant.com
Robin Garr's rating: 95 points
no avatar
User

PatrickWhelan

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

52

Joined

Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:01 pm

Location

Shelby Park

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by PatrickWhelan » Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:41 pm

Great writeup Robin! Anthony and the gang do a tremedous job and there can't be enough written about the things he is doing. Long live Seviche! My wife and I are planning on visiting for the Argentinian menu next week.
Patrick Whelan
Logan Street Market
Safai Coffee & Tea
900 E. Kentucky St.
Louisville, KY 40204
502-693-3865
no avatar
User

Mark Head

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1729

Joined

Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:44 pm

Location

Prospect

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Mark Head » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:26 pm

I personally don't agree with the broader generalizations in this article. Similar trends do not always imply a relationship. There has been a big expansion in independent dining in the eat end the last 3 years or so. Some have met with great success. Shelbyville Road and Browns Lane are within site of the suburban Malls...hardly urban. On the other hand I do agree that Seviche Bistro was in a poor location and was surprised they opened in that spot.

I think the cost of rental space has as much to do with the chains vs. indys as target audience. Hot suburban locations are often in new construction that commands much higher rents than old houses on Frankfort Avenue. Thus the profit margins just aren't there. Chains by economies of scale can pay that higher rent. In addition, take the east-enders who eat in the Highlands and Creasant Hill out of the mix and those restaurants suffer a big hit.

Then again maybe I am another knuckle dragging suburbanite.
no avatar
User

Mark R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

4371

Joined

Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:02 pm

Location

Anchorage, KY

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Mark R. » Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:02 pm

Robin, I think you're making an awful big generalization regarding dining preferences all the Blues' vs. the Reds'! Yes most of the chains are outside the Waterson but I believe the reason for this has more to do with available locations for construction than it does eating preference. On the opposite side as Mark noted the rent in older locations in the urban area allow smaller restaurants to thrive. The type of restaurants and its rise has more to do with economics than with that dining preferences of the residents of the area.

Many suburbanites trek to the urban area to eat at local restaurants and actually it's part of the charm of the restaurants. Many of us gladly bypass the chains to eat out. Also I really question the location chosen for Serviche on Goose Creek, it was off the beaten path and several other restaurants had already failed in that location. Several other excellent restaurants are surviving, even thriving elsewhere in the east end so maybe location had more to do with it than anything else.

Please leave those of us who bleed red alone as far as our dining choices, we support and believe in Louisville Originals as much as you urban blue bloods do! :lol:
Written using Dragon NaturallySpeaking

"Life is short. Drink the good wine first"
no avatar
User

Jeremy J

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

676

Joined

Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:30 am

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Jeremy J » Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:33 am

Mark, I side with Robin, and think you're seriously in the minority...but other than that, I'm not touching this hot potato with a 10-foot clown pole!
no avatar
User

Steve Cecil

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

80

Joined

Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:26 pm

Location

Oldham County

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Steve Cecil » Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:38 am

What color do we Libertarians get? Green is already taken.
no avatar
User

Brian Curl

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Brian Curl » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:14 am

In addition, take the east-enders who eat in the Highlands and Creasant Hill out of the mix and those restaurants suffer a big hit.

I think this hit the nail on the head. Just because folks live inside the Watterson does not mean that they do not dine inside the Watterson. So I guess the generalization is that republicans like cookie cutter chains and dems like cool indies. How outrageously flawed logic and innuendo.
no avatar
User

carla griffin

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1166

Joined

Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:32 pm

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by carla griffin » Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:15 am

Just wondering....
Would Seviche Cafe have fared better say, in Norton Commons?
Carla
There is one thing more exasperating than a wife who can cook and won't, and that's a wife who can't cook and will. ~Robert Frost
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

22998

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Robin Garr » Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:48 am

Mark R. wrote:Robin, I think you're making an awful big generalization regarding dining preferences all the Blues' vs. the Reds'!

Hey, Mark, that's why I wrote "As a statistical generalization, the city and its suburbs are different ..."

Also please note that I've long been notorious for coming up with something weird and wacky to make my reviews a little different from the competition ... I was having a little fun there, and seeing if I could get a reaction ... ;)
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

22998

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Robin Garr » Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:50 am

Brian Curl wrote:Just because folks live inside the Watterson does not mean that they do not dine inside the Watterson.

True to some extent, although that brief flirtation with $4.50/gal gasoline had a marked impact on that habit for a lot of folks.

How outrageously flawed logic and innuendo.

:mrgreen:
no avatar
User

Mark Head

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1729

Joined

Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:44 pm

Location

Prospect

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Mark Head » Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:56 am

Robin Garr wrote:True to some extent, although that brief flirtation with $4.50/gal gasoline had a marked impact on that habit for a lot of folks.


Naw....we east enders just gas up the Hummer and go where ever we want. Unfortunately some of those "inside the Watterson" are self-deluded with a sense of being "hipper-than-thou". I'm sure it will play well in LEO. 8)
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

22998

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Robin Garr » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:03 am

Mark Head wrote:Naw....we east enders just gas up the Hummer and go where ever we want. Unfortunately some of those "inside the Watterson" are self-deluded with a sense of being "hipper-than-thou". I'm sure it will play well in LEO. 8)

Hey, you're talking to a guy who lives two blocks from Porcini and drives a Compact Utility Vehicle ...
no avatar
User

Matthew D

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1347

Joined

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am

Location

No Longer Old Louisville

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Matthew D » Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:03 pm

Mark Head wrote:I personally don't agree with the broader generalizations in this article.


As Robin has already pointed out to some extent, the generalizations are doing certain rhetorical work in the article. You don't have to agree with them. What Robin has accomplished is not only speaking to the assumed audience (LEO leftists) but others who may be interested in the topic at hand (food people). Not only does he speak to both audiences but he constructs the audiences to serve his purpose, which is two-fold: to commend Seviche for its fine cuisine and to get people thinking about dining choices in Louisville. The generalizations are not meant to be agreed with or disagreed with (as no information is truly objective), but, instead, meant to start a conversation. Which is, well, what we have here.
Thinks the frosty mug is the low point in American history.
no avatar
User

Mark Head

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1729

Joined

Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:44 pm

Location

Prospect

Re: LEO/LHB: Seviche: And then there was one. That one!

by Mark Head » Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:29 pm

Matthew D wrote:
Mark Head wrote:I personally don't agree with the broader generalizations in this article.


As Robin has already pointed out to some extent, the generalizations are doing certain rhetorical work in the article. You don't have to agree with them. What Robin has accomplished is not only speaking to the assumed audience (LEO leftists) but others who may be interested in the topic at hand (food people). Not only does he speak to both audiences but he constructs the audiences to serve his purpose, which is two-fold: to commend Seviche for its fine cuisine and to get people thinking about dining choices in Louisville. The generalizations are not meant to be agreed with or disagreed with (as no information is truly objective), but, instead, meant to start a conversation. Which is, well, what we have here.


So Robin is brainwashing me? :shock:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefsbot, AmazonBot 2, Claudebot, YandexBot and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign