Robin Garr wrote:Did you look at the Website I posted, Robert?
.
Robin - please be hesitant to believe everything said in a website with the URL "anti whatever" (in this case "anti-Atkins)! To me that's a basic sign that it's not a balanced scientific examination!
1, As stated by a reader above, NONE of the low-carb diets (including Atkins) advocate a zero-carb high-fat diet. Atkins has you do this for two weeks, just to "jump start" things, but after that gradually adds 'good' carbs, as do South Beach et al.
2. The New York Times Magazine about a year ago published a major look at Atkins, concluding that (a) it works (b) why it works and (c) if followed correctly nothing is bad
3. The US Government tested all diets recently, concluding that a diet eliminating the non-complex carbs was the easiest to stay on, had the lowest recidivism, and the fewest health problems (as long as complex carbs were eaten) . . . this was on tv and newspapers, and I could find the cites if you want
Don't believe the early anti-Atkins rhetoric . . . his book had you on a high fat/no carb diet for two weeks, a low carb/lower fat diet until you got close to your goal, and then a mid-carb lean meat/low fat diet to maintain. Unfortunately, nobody seems to have read beyond the second chapter of his book, including those on the "anti-Atkins" website!
Virtually any diet can work (1) if you are motivated and (2) stick to it. Some are more healthy than others. Atkins is likely NOT the most healthy of all choices, but it has been shown to work, and if followed correctly (by adding complex carbs) is not unhealthy. Maybe it's not as good as Weight Watchers - which includes a more balanced diet - but if followed correctly the comments about danger are overstated.