Ethan Ray wrote:Am I the only one who finds it particularly funny the way some of these restaurants are categorized?
(ie. Asiatique in the best 'New American' catergory)
Some restaurants just didn't fit in any other category?
Robin Garr wrote:Ethan Ray wrote:Am I the only one who finds it particularly funny the way some of these restaurants are categorized?
(ie. Asiatique in the best 'New American' catergory)
Some restaurants just didn't fit in any other category?
At the risk of sounding snarky here, this is a promotion being run by a television station ...
Ethan Ray wrote:point taken.
Robin Garr wrote:Ethan Ray wrote:point taken.
Meanwhile, I registered right after I posted to you, so I could vote for some of the Good Guys too, but I'm still waiting for their confirmation. It's not in my spam folder, either. Huh.
Robin Garr wrote:Ethan Ray wrote:point taken.
Meanwhile, I registered right after I posted to you, so I could vote for some of the Good Guys too, but I'm still waiting for their confirmation. It's not in my spam folder, either. Huh.
Mark R. wrote:Another strange part of this poll is that a restaurant can only be in one category. Many should fit in several. Take for example Lynn's Paradise Cafe, it's in the sandwich category and thus cannot be in the breakfast category where it would probably do much better. The only good side of the poll is that you can have a restaurant added, something you can't do in most other polls. This may be why some restaurants are not in the category we would think they should be, somebody else may think differently.
Heather Y wrote:Thanks for the vote Marie,
The reason why some businesses are listed, and others are not, is because the businesses list themselves, and send out messages for folks to vote. It is pretty much a business tool. See it works!
We were running neck in neck with Toast for awhile! I am not sure where we are now.
Thanks again for the nod Marie!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefsbot, AmazonBot 2, Claudebot, Google [Bot], YandexBot and 3 guests