Robin Garr wrote:Great report, TP! I'm excruciatingly envious.
But tell us one thing, if you can ... in candor and fairness, how would you compare Thai food in Thailand to Thai food in the Derby City? Do any of our Thai eateries come reasonably close in style, or is it a whole 'nuther universe?
TP Lowe wrote:This place was so "off the charts" I find it hard to compare it to Louisville spots. It would be like comparing the Seelbach to the Bristol and trying to sense of it.
Robin Garr wrote:TP Lowe wrote:This place was so "off the charts" I find it hard to compare it to Louisville spots. It would be like comparing the Seelbach to the Bristol and trying to sense of it.
Thanks, TP! Funny, I thought I was replying to your original post, but obviously I clicked the wrong button. Guess I need to learn to use this software, too!
No obvious way to "glue" it back to your original either ... oh, well
TP Lowe wrote:I'm not sure I will have a definitive answer to your question, Robin, but I think the thing that strikes me here is in general the simplicity of ingredients. It may be because this seems to be a very poor country overall, and the average food on the street is very basic, but has the flavors you'd want. The "feast" just can't be compared, because it was full of complexity that the balance of the food I've had did not share.
After back to back Asia trips, I think my new mantra is simplicity but boldness - when I open my first restaurant, that will be my story!
andrew mellman wrote:Just wondering if you've ever been to Arun's in Chicago?
It's a Thai . . . $85/person fixed price . . . when you arrive, servers sit down and discuss your likes/dislikes, food allergies, and heat preferences, then come out with a special designed multi-course feast (they say 12 courses average, but since each is one or two dishes for sharing I'd say closer to 7 or 8 courses by my count). It's supposed to be very authentic, but since I never ate in Thailand I don't know.
andrew mellman wrote:Just wondering if you've ever been to Arun's in Chicago?
It's a Thai . . . $85/person fixed price . . . when you arrive, servers sit down and discuss your likes/dislikes, food allergies, and heat preferences, then come out with a special designed multi-course feast (they say 12 courses average, but since each is one or two dishes for sharing I'd say closer to 7 or 8 courses by my count). It's supposed to be very authentic, but since I never ate in Thailand I don't know.
Ryan B wrote:I know that in the past year or 2 Arun's has lost a star in Chicago Magazine. I had the opportunity to eat there a couple of years back after my brother described it as one of the best meals he ever had. While I thought it was good, it seemed expensive for what you got and not particularly amazing. Funny thing was the lower ranking came out about a month after we ate there. Maybe they've stepped their game back up since then.
andrew mellman wrote:Ryan B wrote:I know that in the past year or 2 Arun's has lost a star in Chicago Magazine. I had the opportunity to eat there a couple of years back after my brother described it as one of the best meals he ever had. While I thought it was good, it seemed expensive for what you got and not particularly amazing. Funny thing was the lower ranking came out about a month after we ate there. Maybe they've stepped their game back up since then.
The Trib and Sun Times both repolrted that Arun's hasn't lost a step . . . the problem is that everyone else is catching up, and they are staying still. Around five years ago they were always ranked one of the top five restaurants in the city. Over the past 5 years, first one and then another reviewer has lowered that ranking, with comments that others are adding to their menu/service while Aruns is doing the "same thing". That doesn't make it bad, but maybe not a first stop?
One example: when you eat at Tru, you get a personalized print-out of your special tasting menu; when you eat at Arun's, you don't (comment from Sun Times).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests