Foodie
966
Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:10 pm
850 main street, charlestown, indiana
Mark R. wrote:Boycotts never are affected in achieving their goals.
Mark R. wrote:Pardon me but how is this any different than Mr. Kerrey's wife's money from her parents family business?
Mark R. wrote:Pardon me but how is this any different than Mr. Kerrey's wife's money from her parents family business? Democrats probably forget that she has much more money than the McCain's which all came from the Heinz corporation and that she loaned much money to the campaign and Heinz Corp. officers and the company itself donated much money to his campaign.
We all know that politics in America is totally controlled by money and candidates both democrat and republican bend over backwards to do whatever it takes to get donations. While I respect individuals commitment to supporting a particular candidate or party I don't believe it's correct for a business to not carry a product because of the political connection of a supplier. It is a disservice to their customers, and a potential loss of business for them. Boycotts never are affected in achieving their goals.
Foodie
72
Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:42 pm
401 East Main St. @ Slugger Field
Mark R. wrote:Boycotts never are affected in achieving their goals.
S Cruz wrote:as budweiser is the standard for "Standard American Lager" (as stated by the BJCP), why such a bad rap? especially since they give you what they say they will on a consistent basis? sounds to me like a world class company and a world class product, irregardless of what someones marriage to a politician may have to do with it. just thought id throw it out there, for what it is, its right on point.... mcain or not. bud is still a great example of "Standard American Lager".
Jeremy J wrote:Mark R. wrote:Boycotts never are affected in achieving their goals.
Politics aside, this quote is just a grammatical train wreck. What does this even mean? Did you mean effective?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests