Bradley C. Pearce wrote:I'm still sort of lost on where cloning is better than artificial inseminating. I'm not being facetious but does anyone know? Is it to grow them faster?
It IS NOT to grow them faster. It's about breeding/developing the perfect animal and the pecentages in doing so. In a "nut shell" (no pun intended). When breeding "the old fasioned way" both sire and dam will carry dormant chromsomes (as far as 3-4 generations back) that can, but not always be undesirable. When you clone, you get that exact animal that was cloned, and any undesirable traits would stay dormant.
Try and think of it like if you were to breed athletes Just b/c you (hypothetically speaking sp?) breed Michael Jordan w/ Sheryl Swoops doesn't guarentee a superstar basketball player. It increases your chances 10 fold, but no guarentee. But if you were to clone MJ, that would be a guarentee. Like I said this is the "short version". I'd be more specific but I'm going to be late for work
That makes sense... wow! Thanks. I know they supposedly are able to weed out the weak gene animals at an early age I wonder what they will do with those animals?