SilvioM wrote:That said, I don't know if I'm more put off by the review or the fact that Proof now serves pop tarts and cotton candy.
DanB wrote:As someone mentioned in the comments... she describes the pop tart as forming a brown, goopy mess on her plate. But the photo taken by a CJ photog shows a literally perfect looking dish, quite the opposite of what she describes.
Robin Garr wrote:DanB wrote:As someone mentioned in the comments... she describes the pop tart as forming a brown, goopy mess on her plate. But the photo taken by a CJ photog shows a literally perfect looking dish, quite the opposite of what she describes.
But that's why I like to take my own food photos if it's practical. I'd rather have the review illustrate what I got in the actual stream of events while I was at dinner.
Mike D wrote:In my meat-eating days I used to frequent both Subway and (blush) Burger King for lunch. Nothing that I got looked anything like what I saw (and continue to see today) in their TV and print advertising.
Carla G wrote:Cool! I should do that with my wedding pictures!
Will Crawford wrote:The poptarts are homemade and delicious. The cotton candy is a whimsical thank you from the staff. Under chef Wajad's helm, I have had some truly amazing meals there. Love it.
Robin Garr wrote:Will Crawford wrote:The poptarts are homemade and delicious. The cotton candy is a whimsical thank you from the staff. Under chef Wajad's helm, I have had some truly amazing meals there. Love it.
Okay, that's fair. So you do you relate that to the review? Or the pop tart in the picture that doesn't seem to match the pop tart in the description?
Will Crawford wrote:The two times I've had it, it looked like the picture. Maybe she had a bad batch or she was looking out for a mother breast feeding and got distracted.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests