Brett Davis wrote:I actually appreciate the fact you kept the restaurant unnamed. Too many people on this site use the word boycott or state they will not go to a restaurant based upon just one person's side of a story. Very gracious on your part.
Robin Garr wrote:Brett Davis wrote:I actually appreciate the fact you kept the restaurant unnamed. Too many people on this site use the word boycott or state they will not go to a restaurant based upon just one person's side of a story. Very gracious on your part.
Okay, I don't want to start the New Year argumentatively, but I don't really want this approach to go un-challenged. While I'm delighted to have lots of restaurateurs participating here, and we want to be sensitive to their needs, this forum has no rule against kicking butt and taking names, and I don't consider it inappropriate or ungracious to do so.
If a consumer has an unfortunate experience at a restaurant, the forum is here for them to say so. If a restaurateur has an unfortunate experience with a customer, ditto. I do want to assure that both sides can be heard, but I'm very uncomfortable with any policy that encourages keeping bad news under wraps.
Leah s wrote:Don't give me too much credit, Brett. I actually have no problem naming the restaurant, but I really wanted to see if others thought I was being too sensitive.
Frankly in the light of the next day, we're actually even more pissed. It didn't exactly ruin the evening, but it certainly put a significant dent in the fun we were having.
And no, there was no mention of a time limit on the table when hubby made the reservation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests