Andrew Mellman wrote:Evidently (and please correct me if I'm off here) wine and tobacco grow in similar environments.
I'm not sure I buy that, exactly. The best environment for growing grapes, year-round, is found in places like coastal California and the Mediterranean (and a few spots in Australia, South America and South Africa with similar mild, dry climates). Second-best environment is someplace like Germany's Rhine and Mosel, which comes closer to our habitat, but not really close enough.
Kentucky's "distinct four-season climate" is not really ideal for great wines. Winters can be vine-killing brutal, and very hot, very humid summers - which you don't get in Germany or the California wine country - are terrible for grapes.
Yes, the state is putting effort and money behind encouraging vineyards to replace tobacco bases, primarily because vineyards are value-added - you can make a lot more money by growing grapes, making wine, and selling the wine than you can by growing and selling soybeans or corn. But it's challenging work, in the vineyard and in the winery; it takes years, decades even, to bring a new winery up to its peak if you're growing your own vines. And sadly, Kentucky - along with the Eastern and Southeastern US in general (*) is not an ideal place to do that.
But there's a plus: Small-farm wineries can tap into the tourist trade to find the REAL bucks, and to be brutally honest, you don't have to make Napa-level wine to do that. It just has to be drinkable, and if you can come up with a wine that even roughly replicates White Zin, or even sweet non-grape wines like blackberry wine - you're golden.
(*) You can find an exception to the "Eastern US doesn't make good wine" rule if you look for places where the "lake effect" mitigates frigid winters in a setting that looks something like Germany. New York's Finger Lakes, Michigan's Lake Michigan coast, and Ontario's Niagara Peninsula are the exceptions that proves this rule.