Jay M. wrote:Doug Davis wrote: I misspoke above. That should have read adjusted based on US productivity rate increases (ie revenue) not inflation.
In which case minimum wage would be $18.30 today and about $19.00 by 2016 (which under the current proposed plan would have us at $10.10 an hour).
If we pegged it to per capita real personal income, the personal income earned in the economy, excluding Social Security and other government programs, adjusted for inflation has grown by 100.6% since 1968. If our standard for minimum wages had kept pace with overall income growth in the American economy, it would now be $21.72 per hour.
If we're tying it to unrelated metrics, how about using Moore's law? That would mean minimum wage would double approximately every two years. So, in unadjusted for inflation terms, and using the period 2004 to 2014, the current minimum wage would be $ 164.80 ($ 342,784 annually). That sounds good to me. Get the Mayor on the phone.
Doug Davis wrote:I misspoke above. That should have read adjusted based on US productivity rate increases (ie revenue) not inflation.
In which case minimum wage would be $18.30 today and about $19.00 by 2016 (which under the current proposed plan would have us at $10.10 an hour).
Steve H wrote:I lost track.
Is Chef Varanese a member of the oppressive oligarchy or not? I've got some serious dining to do.
Steve H wrote:It's not? To dine or not to dine sounds binary to me.
Robin Garr wrote:Steve H wrote:It's not? To dine or not to dine sounds binary to me.
Steve, you apparently read my reply with the same level of attention that you bring to politics.
Steve H wrote:Is Varanese on the socially acceptable list? Or the stick it to the man list?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests