Steve P wrote: the NTSB can kiss my a**...
Robin Garr wrote:I'd like to see the answer to a simple question before I decide if this is a way to save lives or a mere excess of the Nanny State: How many accidents in recent years, nationwide, have involved drivers with BAC between .05 and .08. There's your target. If there are tons of them, then the NTSB has a case worth listening to. But if, as I strongly suspect, the carnage begins at a higher level and ramps up to the ceiling at "Seriously Drunk," then they're not doing anything but hassling social drinkers. If that's what they want, let them admit it, and let them show us the numbers.
Robin Garr wrote:How many accidents in recent years, nationwide, have involved drivers with BAC between .05 and .08.
John S wrote:The NY Times has this graphic that helps answer your question:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/05/27/science/drunk-driving-2011.html
John S wrote:Robin Garr wrote:How many accidents in recent years, nationwide, have involved drivers with BAC between .05 and .08.
The NY Times has this graphic that helps answer your question:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/05/27/science/drunk-driving-2011.html
Jeff Cavanaugh wrote:From that graph, it would seem to make more sense to ban young driving, rather than drunk driving!
Bill P wrote:A Food Forum: The best place on the internet to do interpretation of statistical data. But that's what make this a great place.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests