Chris M wrote:I would have given them maybe a 74.
For the record, I generally wouldn't devote a review to a chain unless I could honestly rate it well into the 80s, dramatically exceeding expectations; or well below 70, which I'll do occasionally if a new chain is drawing crowds and generating a buzz but is so horrible that "foodies" need to be warned. If it earns a standard C grade, I figure I can save my ink for an interesting indie.