Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:50 am
Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:34 pm
Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:18 pm
Richard S. wrote:If nothing else, props for the cajones to respond.
Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:41 am
Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:28 am
Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:03 pm
Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:19 pm
Steve P wrote:Jeremy J wrote:Also- wake up, people. Our local food critics kind of do tend to like nearly everything or at least try to put on a positive spin. It's a reasonable point.
Meh - I can't say I -totally- disagree with this statement but...I think Steve Coomes does an admirable job when it comes to calling it like he sees it. When it comes to Robin and Marty I've observed them both do an admirable job of what is known as "damning by faint praise"...ya just gots tah read between the lines a bit more carefully
Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:41 am
Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:39 pm
Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:01 am
Christina Hall wrote:I found the article to be...unusual.
Some of the phrases that were bolded, didn't make sense in what I *thought* the article was attempting to convey. I was under the impression that the article's slant was that Louisville food critics are just too darn nice and easy going. Fair enough, I think we could probably use some more realistic reviews. But the bolded sentences just seemed to be random bolding of phrases the writer did not like for whatever reason. The highlighted sentences did not help to convey his message, in my opinion.
Then there's the idea of taking other peoples' writing, and putting it through your own personal shredder for some sort of social or monetary gain. I seriously doubt Zach would like for his writing to be put to that same test. I found it lacking in originality and rather juvenile, to be honest.The entire article (which was comprised mostly of others' works) had a smirky, condescending tone which I found extremely off-putting. I generally wouldn't say any such thing about another's endeavors, but I believe the author feels that we should be more honest...so I am.
Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:47 am
Wed May 13, 2009 10:12 am
Whoa...easy on Zach guys. He is exactly the type of young professional talent the city is trying to attract and keep.
It should also be kindly pointed out that the Courier awards a maximum of four stars, not five.
Then there's the idea of taking other peoples' writing, and putting it through your own personal shredder for some sort of social or monetary gain. I seriously doubt Zach would like for his writing to be put to that same test.
Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:32 am
Marybeth B wrote: On another topic, if you don't understand why someone would talk about a restaurant being in the old Sears building (or the White Castle at Bardstown and Eastern Pkwy, or Stewart's, or any of the "used to be" landmarks) you don't understand Louisville.Know your audience.
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
In Time Out Room
Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:08 pm
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests