Alison Hanover wrote:The prize at the end is real surely. The winner would have to be capable of running whatever restaurant the prize is for.
This is a common misconception, and no wonder, what with the way they promote it. However, for certain reasons, I have done a little research on this. The prize is touted as "Head Chef" of whatever the restaurant of the season is. This is not to be confused with "Executive Chef". "Head Chef" can be whatever they want it to be, including a nominal, promotional title. And at least some seasons, if not all, the winner can elect to simply take the $however-many-thousand dollar annual salary as a lump sum, and never set foot in the restaurant at all.
So yes, it it mostly personality-driven. They want drama. They want to sprinkle crappy cooks in there to create it. It also seems to help if you look either really good or really bad in a bathing suit, as the contestants seem to end up in them at least once every season.
For Ramsay haters, please avail yourself of some of his other shows on BBC America (or you can watch on Netflix or YouTube), such as "The F Word" and "Gordon's Great Escape". The Gordon Ramsay on Hell's Kitchen US is a
cartoon - an overblown caricature of the man. The Simon Cowell of cooking.
It says a lot about us as American entertainment consumers that HK US producers think this version of Chef Ramsay would be more readily gobbled up in the States. Judging from the massive popularity of the show, it seems they must be right!