Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.

Proper tip for carry-out

no avatar
User

GaryF

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

2006

Joined

Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:05 am

by GaryF » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:59 am

Michelle R. wrote:Some delivery places are now adding $1.50 in delivery charges on to the grand total. I'd have no problem with it if they were upfront about it, but the fact that they are doing in on the down-low, so to speak, really urks me.

I would imagine that any charge an establishment charges goes to the cast of materials, not to the staff.
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:03 am

I thought that the price of the food included the cost of materials? If you eat in, it's the cost of the plates and glasses and someone to wash them. if it's carry-out, it's the cost of the styrofoam.
no avatar
User

GaryF

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

2006

Joined

Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:05 am

by GaryF » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:07 am

I would still bet neither the servers or the kithchen staff see any part of the $1.50.
Last edited by GaryF on Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:12 am

Oh, I totally agree with that, just saying that it's disingenuous to claim an added cost for a to-go order.
no avatar
User

Steve Shade

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1364

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:53 am

by Steve Shade » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:06 pm

Ron Johnson wrote:Oh, I totally agree with that, just saying that it's disingenuous to claim an added cost for a to-go order.


Which is what El Mundo does.
no avatar
User

Michelle R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1398

Joined

Wed May 30, 2007 1:28 pm

Location

Hikes Point

by Michelle R. » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:25 pm

This is a Pizza delivery joint I'm talking about.

No dine in, you can come pick it up, or have it delivered. I'd have no problem with it if they were upfront about it when you placed your order, such as the person answering the phone telling saying "we have a $1.50 delivery charge." It's not the amount, a $1.50 isn't a big deal. It's the fact that they sneak it in to the total amount.

I'm guessing they're adding it on to try to make up for people who are crappy tippers, which my hubby and I are not. Like I said, it's not the money, it's the principal.
no avatar
User

Michelle R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1398

Joined

Wed May 30, 2007 1:28 pm

Location

Hikes Point

by Michelle R. » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:29 pm

This is a Pizza delivery joint I'm talking about.

No dine in, you can come pick it up, or have it delivered. I'd have no problem with it if they were upfront about it when you placed your order, such as the person answering the phone telling saying "we have a $1.50 delivery charge." It's not the amount, a $1.50 isn't a big deal. It's the fact that they sneak it in to the total amount.

I'm guessing they're adding it on to try to make up for people who are crappy tippers, which my hubby and I are not. Like I said, it's not the money, it's the principal.
no avatar
User

Deb Hall

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

4169

Joined

Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm

Location

Highlands , Louisville

by Deb Hall » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:39 pm

I thought that the price of the food included the cost of materials? If you eat in, it's the cost of the plates and glasses and someone to wash them. if it's carry-out, it's the cost of the styrofoam.


Ron,
The cost to a restaurant of both options is not the same. In-house eating doesn't cost extra- that's part of the plan and dishwashers are already there. Consumables do cost extra, particularly the nice ones/microwavable ones from "more progressive" restaurants. We paid .$35 - $.50 each for our reusable microwave safe containers and sauce cups. But the real cost is in the additional prep/organizational time as previously mentioned.

With that said, I don't think it's a good customer service model to charge extra for carry-out. And I don't agree with a charge if you not are told up-front.

Deb
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

22999

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:55 pm

Dan Thomas wrote:Heck, I should start another thread on the subject of "Servers vs. Chefs" and the constant battles between front and back of the house.


Heh! Could be a great thread, if enough people were willing to post. ;)
no avatar
User

Michelle R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1398

Joined

Wed May 30, 2007 1:28 pm

Location

Hikes Point

by Michelle R. » Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:29 am

Ack, I apologize for the double post. Apparently, my computer had the hiccups yesterday.

It was Papa John's, for anyone wondering.
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:38 am

Deb Hall wrote:
I thought that the price of the food included the cost of materials? If you eat in, it's the cost of the plates and glasses and someone to wash them. if it's carry-out, it's the cost of the styrofoam.


Ron,
The cost to a restaurant of both options is not the same. In-house eating doesn't cost extra- that's part of the plan and dishwashers are already there. Consumables do cost extra, particularly the nice ones/microwavable ones from "more progressive" restaurants. We paid .$35 - $.50 each for our reusable microwave safe containers and sauce cups. But the real cost is in the additional prep/organizational time as previously mentioned.

With that said, I don't think it's a good customer service model to charge extra for carry-out. And I don't agree with a charge if you not are told up-front.

Deb


when I was in the business we included the cost of to-go containers just as we did wine glasses, linen supply, and the candles for the tables.

It takes far less time and work to pack up a meal to go, than it does to wait on a table that dines in the restaurant.
no avatar
User

Amy Hoover

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

230

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:27 pm

Location

Butchertown

by Amy Hoover » Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:06 am

Heck, I should start another thread on the subject of "Servers vs. Chefs" and the constant battles between front and back of the house.


I've grown weary of this whole back of house versus front of house issue. If chefs/cooks/etc.. want to make tips, they should become servers or bartenders and take the chance of walking out being paid $2.13 an hour for their shift. If servers/bartenders want to tell the cooks how the menu should be or allow special orders without asking the kitchen, etc... they should get a job in the kitchen. It doesn't have to be a constant battle, and I absolutely detest when a FOH manager or a kitchen manager seem to be the ones advocating the tensions.

There are good and bad points to both sides of it. There certainly doesn't have to be an ongoing riff between the two if both are expected to act respectful of one another at all times. I know several servers that often tip the kitchen out after an evening of excellent food coming out of the kitchen consistently. I also know several chefs who go out of their way to teach servers about food and flavor pairing, etc...

A restaurant runs so much more smoothly and efficiently when the FOH and BOH can work together and appreciate and respect each other. I, for one, am tired of hearing complaining from both sides. This is the nature of the business. If you don't love food AND love ensuring your guests have the best possible experience, then you shouldn't be in this business period-in the FOH or BOH.

(Ps.....this isn't an attack on your statement, Dan. Your statement just brought the subject up!)
“Fear less, hope more; Eat less, chew more; Whine less, breathe more; Talk less, say more; Love more, and all good things will be yours”

Swedish Proverb
no avatar
User

Ron Johnson

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1716

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 am

by Ron Johnson » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:20 am

Amy Hoover wrote:
Heck, I should start another thread on the subject of "Servers vs. Chefs" and the constant battles between front and back of the house.


I've grown weary of this whole back of house versus front of house issue. If chefs/cooks/etc.. want to make tips, they should become servers or bartenders and take the chance of walking out being paid $2.13 an hour for their shift. If servers/bartenders want to tell the cooks how the menu should be or allow special orders without asking the kitchen, etc... they should get a job in the kitchen. It doesn't have to be a constant battle, and I absolutely detest when a FOH manager or a kitchen manager seem to be the ones advocating the tensions.

There are good and bad points to both sides of it. There certainly doesn't have to be an ongoing riff between the two if both are expected to act respectful of one another at all times. I know several servers that often tip the kitchen out after an evening of excellent food coming out of the kitchen consistently. I also know several chefs who go out of their way to teach servers about food and flavor pairing, etc...

A restaurant runs so much more smoothly and efficiently when the FOH and BOH can work together and appreciate and respect each other. I, for one, am tired of hearing complaining from both sides. This is the nature of the business. If you don't love food AND love ensuring your guests have the best possible experience, then you shouldn't be in this business period-in the FOH or BOH.

(Ps.....this isn't an attack on your statement, Dan. Your statement just brought the subject up!)


amen sister.
no avatar
User

Dan Thomas

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

2466

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:19 am

Location

Sunny Forest Hills

by Dan Thomas » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:44 am

Amy Hoover wrote:A restaurant runs so much more smoothly and efficiently when the FOH and BOH can work together and appreciate and respect each other.


I have to agree with you 100%. But in my experience this is the rare exception rather than the rule at most places.

I think it would be good to"air out" some of these differences between F and BOH in a forum like this.

Having been on both sides of the issue myself, I think it would make a great topic.It also gives other Fourmities(who may not work in the "bizz") and readers an idea of just how hard our business really is and the great lengths we go to keep our customers happy, even though there may be some internal strife involved.

By no means am I encouraging name-calling and finger pointing, but what I feel what leads to alot of aforementioned "tension" in restaurants is a lack of communication from both sides and I felt this would be a great way to get some issues out there.
Dan Thomas
Operator Specialist
Waypoint

dthomas@awpwaypoint.com

"People who aren't interested in food seem rather dry, unloving and don't have a real gusto for life."
Julia Child
no avatar
User

Amy Hoover

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

230

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:27 pm

Location

Butchertown

by Amy Hoover » Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:28 pm

By no means am I encouraging name-calling and finger pointing, but what I feel what leads to alot of aforementioned "tension" in restaurants is a lack of communication from both sides and I felt this would be a great way to get some issues out there.


I agree with you 100%
“Fear less, hope more; Eat less, chew more; Whine less, breathe more; Talk less, say more; Love more, and all good things will be yours”

Swedish Proverb
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Facebook, SemrushBot and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign