Will Crawford wrote:So did they save the old house?
JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
Robin Garr wrote:JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
I think the house is considered more historic, and more characteristic of the Victorian style of the neighborhood, than the diner, which looked cool because of the giant pickle but was otherwise just a cheap '50s building. But I'm just guessing here ...
JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
David R. Pierce wrote:JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
Did you ever go in the diner? It needed to be torn down, loaded on trucks and taken for incineration. That would be the only way it would be clean enough for a land fill. The internet meme for this is "Kill it with fire".
JustinHammond wrote:David R. Pierce wrote:JustinHammond wrote:I find it strange we can destroy Genny's to make a parking lot for an ice cream shop going in the run down house Genny's wanted to make into a parking lot.
Did you ever go in the diner? It needed to be torn down, loaded on trucks and taken for incineration. That would be the only way it would be clean enough for a land fill. The internet meme for this is "Kill it with fire".
I went in about 7 years ago when I moved to Louisville. The place was a little dingy, like most diners, and the food was pretty good. The whole "historical" thing just really gets to me. What does that house mean to Louisville? It sure as hell wasn't bringing in out of towners like Genny's did. I don't care what gets torn down, but it seems like a slap in the face to not let Genny's tear down the old house, but let the new old house owner tear down Genny's. I live Comfy Cow as much as the next guy, but would have rather had Genny's scrubbed clean (restored) and had a restaurant in that location.
David R. Pierce wrote: Have you seen the pictures of the house when Farris bought it? It is criminal what he did to that house, historical or not. I believe broken sidewalk is where the pictures are.
JustinHammond wrote:David R. Pierce wrote: Have you seen the pictures of the house when Farris bought it? It is criminal what he did to that house, historical or not. I believe broken sidewalk is where the pictures are.
Yeah, I've seen them and it is crappy how he let the house go, but I'm sure parking lot was on his mind when he bought it. I'm just not buying that the house was more worthy of "saving" than Genny's. It's gone now, so it really doesn't matter. I didn't eat there, so it effects me none, but it just seems strange how everything happened.
JustinHammond wrote:David R. Pierce wrote: Have you seen the pictures of the house when Farris bought it? It is criminal what he did to that house, historical or not. I believe broken sidewalk is where the pictures are.
Yeah, I've seen them and it is crappy how he let the house go, but I'm sure parking lot was on his mind when he bought it. I'm just not buying that the house was more worthy of "saving" than Genny's. It's gone now, so it really doesn't matter. I didn't eat there, so it effects me none, but it just seems strange how everything happened.
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot and 2 guests