DanB wrote:Wow. Three cheers for all involved. The Browns are really putting their money in a bit of a black hole for the good of the city. I hope it turns into a success for them which is anything but certain.
Antonia L wrote:"Eyesore" is in the eye of the beholder. I think they're beautiful, and will become more so with owners who care about their restoration. Plus, they are architecturally significant and add a lot to our downtown, so this is great news.
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
Dan Thomas wrote:Woopity Doo!, Several more years of looking at eyesore buildings...........
Antonia L wrote:"Eyesore" is in the eye of the beholder. I think they're beautiful, and will become more so with owners who care about their restoration. Plus, they are architecturally significant and add a lot to our downtown, so this is great news.
Jason G wrote:It's terrible all this evil development has taken place downtown. It was such a nice place when i was growing up in the 1980s.
Jason G wrote:My problem with this fiasco is that those in favor of preserving the buildings fight to keep them, even if it means they remain in their dilapidated state. The city would be much better served by Blue developing them than leaving them the way they are in their current state. At least they would be safe and bring in some money to the community, including local independent businesses that serve the area.
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
Jason G wrote:I agree with 99% of your sentiments Robin, including this one now that those in favor of saving it are actually ponying up some money.
My problem with this fiasco is that those in favor of preserving the buildings fight to keep them, even if it means they remain in their dilapidated state. The city would be much better served by Blue developing them than leaving them the way they are in their current state. At least they would be safe and bring in some money to the community, including local independent businesses that serve the area. But my god, they've been there 100 years if they are so historically important to so many people, how come noone ever restored them??
Matthew D wrote:While politicians and corporations want us to only think via binaries, there are other options. I'm excited to see what new developments can be made with these old buildings. It doesn't have to be new versus old, good versus bad, dilapidated versus developed.
Users browsing this forum: AmazonBot 2, Claudebot and 6 guests