Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

"Waitress" gets workout in CJ Cumberland Brews rev

by Robin Garr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:00 am

Not that I'm exactly PC or anything myself, but it seemed just a little startling to see Marty using "waitress" throughout his Cumberland Brews review this morning, and the editors picking it up in the headline. How do you service-industry professionals out there feel about this? Do you think of the terms "waiter" and "waitress" as demeaning, old-fashioned, or could you care less as long as an appropriate tip is dispensed?

The review is unusually beefy for the CJ at 698 words, and so strongly positive that, as is so often the case with Scene, I find myself wondering just what nits went unmentioned to hold the rating down to a flat three stars.

[url=http://cityguide.courier-journal.com/fe/RestaurantReviews/Profile.asp?businessid=46679]Trust your waitress
Cumberland Brews' Gazpacho is HOT, the beer cold[/url]

<B>Cumberland Brews</B>
1576 Bardstown Road
(502) 458-8727
no avatar
User

Brian Curl

by Brian Curl » Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:56 am

I'd agree that is a little unusual, however I might not have noticed had you not pointed it out.

However, nice to see CB get some good pub. Not that they need it because they always seem to have a steady business but sure this won't hurt.
no avatar
User

Jay M.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

795

Joined

Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:09 pm

by Jay M. » Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:40 am

Robin, is the piece that you wrote for the LEO Dining Guide last year about shadowing the Volare server still available on-line? I found a link to it on the old forum, but the link is dead. I'd like to see it again, if you can direct me to it.
no avatar
User

Kim H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

943

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:07 pm

Location

Louisville

by Kim H » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:45 pm

I don't like the terms 'waiter' and 'waitress', personally, and I do find it unusual in these times that Marty would use that term. I find it old fashioned, and a bit demeaning. I compare it to 'Stewardess' versus 'Flight Attendant'; it's out of date, and too gender-specific. It doesn't necessarily offend me, but it makes my eyes krinkle.
no avatar
User

LesP

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

30

Joined

Tue May 01, 2007 6:29 am

Location

Louisville, KY

by LesP » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:34 pm

For what it's worth, I find a majority of our guests still say "our waitress/my waitress" etc. when I do table visits. It seems this particular part of our "PC" culture hasn't invaded Louisville yet.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:16 pm

Kim H wrote:I compare it to 'Stewardess' versus 'Flight Attendant'; it's out of date, and too gender-specific. It doesn't necessarily offend me, but it makes my eyes krinkle.


All the flight attendants I know really dislike the term, and I think most frequent fliers pick up on that and decline to use it. Now that I think of it, this may be what struck me as off-key about Marty's column today: I think most serious "foodies" and people who dine out a lot understand that it's old-fashioned and too gender-specific. While my blue-haired mother might innocently call a server a waitress and a flight attendant a stewardess, I wouldn't really expect a forumite - or a food journalist for a major newspaper - to do the same.
no avatar
User

Charles W.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

970

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:53 pm

Location

Schnitzelburg

by Charles W. » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:44 pm

The difference between stewardess and waitress is that flight attendants were assumed to be women and all called stewardesses. The terms "waiter" and "waitress" are both used, just in a gender specific way. I only use "server" if I'm really thinking about it. I use "wait" more often.
no avatar
User

Charles W.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

970

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:53 pm

Location

Schnitzelburg

by Charles W. » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:46 pm

Robin Garr wrote:too gender-specific.


You'll have to make a case why a gender-specific term is inherently problematic or I'll start calling you on using "wife" or "daughter."
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:11 pm

Charles W. wrote:
Robin Garr wrote:too gender-specific.


You'll have to make a case why a gender-specific term is inherently problematic or I'll start calling you on using "wife" or "daughter."


I don't think it's a slur to use it, but the fact is that it's an example of language changing and the old term seeming just a bit old-fashioned. To generalize, I'd argue that many, maybe most, terms that sort people into categories by gender <i>when there's no difference in the duties that they perform</i> seem more like the language our parents and grandparents used than the one we speak.
no avatar
User

Vince Yustas

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

141

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:38 pm

Location

Brandenburg, KY

by Vince Yustas » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:19 pm

Robin Garr wrote:
Kim H wrote:too gender-specific.


I agree with Charles. Sometimes we get just a little too PC. Example: "Chairperson" is the generic head of a committee until the position is actually filled by a living human being. Then the designation is "Chairwoman" or "Chairman" as appropriate. Why don't we call the President's wife the First Spouse? (although that issue might very well come up in 2009!)
Vince Yustas
Brandenburg (nee Paterson, NJ) KY
"Only a fool argues with a skunk, a mule or the cook."
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:59 pm

Vince Yustas wrote:
Robin Garr wrote:
Kim H wrote:too gender-specific.


I agree with Charles. Sometimes we get just a little too PC. Example: "Chairperson" is the generic head of a committee until the position is actually filled by a living human being. Then the designation is "Chairwoman" or "Chairman" as appropriate.


Well, I didn't really hear Charles say that, though.

I'm not really here to defend PC, and for the record, I think calling a person a "chair" is stupid.

But my argument regarding the CJ column today doesn't really rest on PC. That battle is already over as far as "waitress" and "stewardess" is concerned: The words are still in the dictionary, but they're going out of fashion, and I don't think most people in those respective businesses still use them. Again, it's not a case of it being a mortal or even venial sin, just a rather odd thing for a general-interest publication to do.
no avatar
User

Steve Shade

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1364

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:53 am

by Steve Shade » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:42 pm

Robin said "Not that I'm exactly PC or anything myself"

This couldn't be more PC. A waitress is a female. A waiter is a male. So, what's the problem?
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

by Robin Garr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:54 pm

Steve Shade wrote:This couldn't be more PC. A waitress is a female. A waiter is a male. So, what's the problem?


Nothing, if you don't mind sounding like your own grandfather. <shrug>
no avatar
User

Steve Shade

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1364

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:53 am

by Steve Shade » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:00 pm

Robin Garr wrote:
Steve Shade wrote:This couldn't be more PC. A waitress is a female. A waiter is a male. So, what's the problem?


Nothing, if you don't mind sounding like your own grandfather. <shrug>


Understand ... however a waitress is a female and a waiter is a male. Very little doubt about that. Personally I usually use the term "server".

I guess my grandfather could be "Marty Rosen".

Nitpicking about this is completely "politically correct".
no avatar
User

Kim H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

943

Joined

Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:07 pm

Location

Louisville

by Kim H » Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 pm

Like I said, I don't really take offense to the terms waitress or waiter, I mostly just find them outdated, and a little unprofessional choice of words for a food critic. I will say that in general, I don't believe that occupations should specify gender, I just don't. But it's not something that's going to rile my feathers, and I do agree that the PC thing has gone way overboard. My comments were more specific to a food writer choosing this term than Joe Public using them.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, PetalBot and 7 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign