Pete O wrote:Free Bud still costs too much.
Robin Garr wrote:Pete O wrote:Free Bud still costs too much.
Some things are priceless ... and not in a good way.
Steve P wrote:Not as good as that Bell's Two Hearted Ale
I guess I just have lower standards, which should surprise very few of you
Robin Garr wrote:Steve P wrote:Not as good as that Bell's Two Hearted Ale
There's hope for you yet, Stevie!I guess I just have lower standards, which should surprise very few of you
Oh, wait, maybe there's not ...
Pete O wrote:Free Bud still costs too much.
Steve P wrote:Not as good as that Bell's Two Hearted Ale waiting in the on deck circle but pretty good none the less. I guess I just have lower standards, which should surprise very few of you
Ed Vermillion
Foodie
1765
Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:32 pm
38 degrees 25' 25' N 85 degrees 36' 2' W
Roger A. Baylor wrote:Steve P wrote:Not as good as that Bell's Two Hearted Ale waiting in the on deck circle but pretty good none the less. I guess I just have lower standards, which should surprise very few of you
Now that Steve has acknowledged the obvious, we needn't ever listen again to his lawn mowing = bad beer analogy, right?
Besides, pet shampoo is not supposed to be taken internally ...
Roger A. Baylor wrote:Steve P wrote:Not as good as that Bell's Two Hearted Ale waiting in the on deck circle but pretty good none the less. I guess I just have lower standards, which should surprise very few of you
Now that Steve has acknowledged the obvious, we needn't ever listen again to his lawn mowing = bad beer analogy, right?
Besides, pet shampoo is not supposed to be taken internally ...
Users browsing this forum: AmazonBot 2, Bytespider, Claudebot, Facebook, Google [Bot] and 7 guests