Robin Garr wrote:Susanne Smith wrote:I think people who are advocating Diners are thinking some hipster version of the traditional diner. I've eaten at quite a few of them up north and most are mediocre at the best, and have ten page menus where you know that the quality is questionable with such a variety of cuisines to attempt. Same with the bakery section of most large diners... shiny, bright, pastries with little or no taste. These are not chef driven diners, but large all night affairs with a little something for everyone.
Word. We lived in NYC from 1990-94 and enjoyed a lot of diners. The mood is nostalgic and makes you feel good, but the food? Meh. When we lived in Astoria, in Queens, The Neptune Diner was widely reputed as "the diner so good that all the other diner owners eat there on their day off." It was meh. Greasy, heavy food. Where's the appeal? Beats the hell out of me. Gimme Shady Lane any day and twice on Sundays.
I've eaten at some lame diners too, but there are good ones.
Personally, If it were my diner, it would be a hybrid of Waffle House, Cracker Barell and a drugstore soda fountain, with scratch made foods of better quality. It certainly doesn't have to be hipster, highbrow or frou frou.
Sadly, sometimes the simplest and most comforting foods are the hardest to execute well. Particularly when it becomes an issue of expense. Let's face it, you can easily replace good, scratch made food prepared by expensive, qualified labor with less costly premade items that are average at best and a lot of places do that. I guess that's why I gush about Shapiero's in Indianapolis so much. Sure it's a little more expensive to eat there, but
EVERYTHING is scratch made. It takes a small army of expensive labor to churn out good quality stuff like that day in and day out.
That's why I would have to win the lottery to bring my vison of a diner to life!
