Marsha L. wrote:Becky M wrote:i dont know if it would actually cost more to produce the mashed potatoes with a ricer, i would think it is the same amount of work that goes into mashing them with a masher.....
Becky, I'm not picking on you, but I doubt you've ever had the fun of slaving over a tub of hot steamy potatoes with a ricer. It takes about four times longer than using any other method, and unless you want to reheat them you have to work about twice as fast to get the additional ingredients in before they cool. Also, importantly, if you're going to pipe them through a star tip or form them into a sort of fancy duchesse preparation, well - you're going to want to make damn sure there aren't any lumps to clog your progress.
nope.... i understand you are not picking on me....lol
I was seriously interested. And you kind of clarified what i was wondering about. I thought it was easier with a ricer. I have never used one, but have seen them used before. But then again that is just for the small amounts that they make on cooking segments.