Really? Are my Southern
Robin Garr wrote:Reagan H wrote:Thanks to others for reinforcing the purpose of my "over-the-top" yapping. As no one referred to my specifiI can only assume the tone of both John and Robin was the "good" kind of snarky.
No, actually, I didn't care for it much. I thought my comments made that clear. I simply said it didn't reach the level where I thought it was time to raise hell, because I do allow a fair amount of latitude here in the hope the group will be civil by consensus rather than by force.
Aren't we joking about how comments aren't clear on the 'net? Hi Robin, I read your response stating your notice of the edge of a sharp conversation. I believed you initiated the use of the popular word snarky. Perhaps what wasn't so clear to me was the intent of characterizing my unhappiness to a recent trend in topic discussions that could be addressed, or ignored. *shrugs* Characterizing it as yapping from under a porch. Not sure what was unclear in that.
Or why my choice to ask for (peace, manners, wasn't it?) has to conform your threshold as forum administer. Or why my quote was so mangled as to make another good comeback without addressing the specifics I offered. Ah, but, here I am, probably missing the entire good intentions through the mismanagement of the faceless internet. So, I will take your comments in stride, look up the LHB meaning of raising hell, another unnecessary characterization of my behavior, that differs from the raising hell of my Texas relatives, and find a middle ground.
You are right, we should police ourselves. And it ain't my job to do it. But when I ask for peace, after back and forth in one thread, and reference specific examples of other recent threads that don't even need to be mentioned, don't question the validity of my statement without addressing the points in my statement. Don't insult my statement or it's validity with callous turns of phrases. And use my name, at least Phil got that.
And let me know when I qualify as a voice that could be part of a "consensus" you speak of. A consensus that likes to talk about
food, not what or who is worthy to talk about it. I could quote a recent back and forth, in which one injured party claimed, "you owe me an apology, buddy" but all that is owed to anyone, facing you or over the net, is respect. "Authentic" respect.

Since we both like food I'll camp on that middle ground a while, but I think I have a right to say if something is ridonk. And we've had a lot of ridonk lately.
John Hagan wrote:Reagan H wrote: I can only assume the tone of both John and Robin was the "good" kind of snarky.
While I cant speak for Robin....Im all about the good snarky.
And now that I am clear about that, I'll come snark next to you John.
Arguing over the internet, while a wonderful evening can still await. I'm Reagan, Crazy Cat Lady, or, if you prefer (trying to instill light, playful tone), I'm Doug, and I'm outta he-r-r-e.