Hi, Lisa here this time.
I didn't reply earlier because it was Josh who really wanted to speak, and I have a sinus headache that feels like Budweiser Clidesdales are marching across my face (bad pun intended). I've taken a (generic) Zyrtec, and I'm feeling better now.
I feel like I need to chime in here. Because we are owned by a large corporation, it is assumed that we give good reviews of corporate-owned businesses out of some loyalty to large corporations or disloyalty to locally owned ones. If you think about it, where would the integrity be in that? Should we only give good reviews to local businesses and automatically pan the chains? That wouldn't be right at all, and I wouldn't work for a publication that did that. And advertising doesn't have anything to do with it, either. Believe me, I've had my share of nasty e-mails from ad reps after giving their clients bad reviews. It doesn't change my position or that of my editors.
Josh went to a chain to check it out because that is his job. He gave an honest review and was called "clueless" for it. Josh and I are pretty good friends, and I can tell you he knows more about beer than most people I know. While he prefers a dark beer, I'm perfectly happy to unwind after a long day with an ice cold Miller Lite (shocker!). I will go to BJ's at some point and review the food, but I'm glad he went there to give an opinion on the beer. It's not my specialty (that being nachos and chicken wings).
We all like to frequent locally owned businesses. This is my hometown, and I love it. I want to see businesses do well, but like Ethan pointed out, we can't all buy local all the time. If I want a pair of jeans, I don't know any local jeans-makers that will stitch them up for me. I don't know any locally owned car companies that will build me a car.
We can't all work for local businesses, either. I've worked for corporate-owned newspapers as well as family owned, and there's really not much difference. Ladies and gentlemen, I've worked for some real stinkers! I once worked for a family owned newspaper in Kansas that treated its employees
far worse than Gannett does. I'll never go around saying that Gannett is a wonderful company, but it could be a lot worse. I've been there. We're one of the few large media companies that hasn't had newsroom layoffs (knock on wood!)
If you don't like Velocity or find that its contents don't suit you, it's likely because you don't fit into our target demographic. But don't go around trashing us -- the writers and editors -- because it isn't your cup of tea. I don't like celebrity gossip mags, but I don't assume that the people who write for them are ignorant, younger or less educated than I am. It's just that I enjoy other types of magazines. We are a niche publication that is here to meet a certain market need. My reviews are targeted to a younger audience who aren't foodies, just people who like to go out and eat sometimes and not spend a whole lot of money doing so. That's why my reviews are short and to the point. It isn't because of some Gannett-mandated space requirement. When I've needed more space, I've always gotten it.
The reason I recently joined this forum is to speak up and clear up misunderstandings. Our rival publication has been hounding us for five straight years, making jokes at our expense and treating us like we are idiots. Finally, we've stopped taking it. And that's the same spirit in which Josh and I are speaking up here. ("We're mad as hell, and we're ... OK, not really.

)
Also, I enjoy talking about food and reading the threads.
I believe that most of the people on this forum are good people who do know a lot about food, and probably a lot more than I do. I've always had a good time judging contests with Robin. I use this forum as a good source of information.
All I ask is that you remember that we are people, too, not just some nameless corporate tools. We do our jobs the best we can and we take a lot of pride in our work. Please, criticize all you like. But don't attack us personally.
One more thing:
the overall tendency of Velocity to be flippant at the expense of accuracy
Where does that come from? We've never taken accuracy lightly, and I challenge you to name some of these inacuracies.