Roger A. Baylor wrote:
Thanks to Sara F, who encapsulates my viewpoint with stunning clarity.
+1 I think that's a sentiment of many of us!
Roger A. Baylor wrote:
Thanks to Sara F, who encapsulates my viewpoint with stunning clarity.
Shane Campbell
In Time Out Room
626
Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:08 pm
Hoosierville
Jason H wrote:This is dumb and you're all dumb for posting about this issue. It is not bullying and quit trying to act like you all hate big corporations. Either you like West 6 and drink it or you don't. I have heard too much about this over the past couple of days. It is ridiculous for Magic Hat to bother West 6, but West 6 is too small to bother trying to fight this issue. Let's all move on to more important things already.
Roger A. Baylor wrote:
Thanks to Sara F, who encapsulates my viewpoint with stunning clarity.
Jason H wrote:This is dumb and you're all dumb for posting about this issue. It is not bullying and quit trying to act like you all hate big corporations. Either you like West 6 and drink it or you don't. I have heard too much about this over the past couple of days. It is ridiculous for Magic Hat to bother West 6, but West 6 is too small to bother trying to fight this issue. Let's all move on to more important things already.
Jason G wrote:Just posted to say don't confuse this guy with me lol.
Shane Campbell
In Time Out Room
626
Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:08 pm
Hoosierville
Will Crawford wrote:Does anyone else see the confusion between the Mountain Dew logo
Paul S wrote::lol: regardless of any lawsuit, what self-respecting beer snob drinks Magic Hat anyway?
Robin Garr wrote:Paul S wrote::lol: regardless of any lawsuit, what self-respecting beer snob drinks Magic Hat anyway?
Hasn't that been the sub-text all along? It's like Blue Moon Lite?
Roger A. Baylor wrote:Robin Garr wrote:Paul S wrote::lol: regardless of any lawsuit, what self-respecting beer snob drinks Magic Hat anyway?
Hasn't that been the sub-text all along? It's like Blue Moon Lite?
It's an important sub-text. Self-respecting "aficionados" haven't touched Magic hat for quite a while, and today's target Magic Hat drinker likely is ignorant of the social media furor. This imbroglio is damage-free for Magic Hat.
This is an attack over packaged shelf space, nothing more. Magic Hat wouldn't bother if West 6th wasn't producing cans that might displace its own product. The lawsuit threatens a financial drain on the part of a start-up -- and that's why it's bullying, pure and simple.
DanB wrote:Guess Magic Hat should have done THEIR due diligence on who they were tangling with. But I still think those who think they are rooting for the "little guy" are getting played for suckers.
DanB wrote:And not to bring partisan politics into it
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider, Claudebot, DuckAssistBot, Facebook, Google [Bot] and 12 guests