I'm not a doctor, nor do I play one on TV. However, this is what I've gleaned from my research on the topic. I'm not a fan of hysterics, and I think both sides of the issue have blown it out of proportion to some extent. No, the pandemic isn't as serious as originally thought (though there would be many people bemoaning the government response had they not been prepared for a serious pandemic). On the other hand, a lot of misinformation is going around about the vaccines.
Thimerosal is only used in multi-dose vials of the flu vaccines (seasonal and H1N1); pregnant women and children can get the single-dose vaccine which only has trace amounts (<1 microgram per dose). I am neither, but still got a single-dose vaccine at the Walgreen's clinic.
To put the amount of mercury per dose into perspective, a dose of the multi-dose vial vaccine has 25 micrograms of mercury in it. According to my calculations (with data taken from the FDA), a 5 oz. can of albacore tuna contains, on average, around 50 micrograms of mercury. I'm not saying that either is safe, you just don't see a whole lot of people up in arms about a can of tuna...
Humans in general tend to assign large probabilities to rare occurrences that garner a lot of media attention. This explains why people, against sound science/statistics, are afraid to fly, afraid to get vaccines, and play the lottery. I think this is called cognitive bias due to the availability heuristic (though it's been a while since college psych.)
I take issue with the Mercola article. I was able to take one purported "fact" from the article and debunk it within a matter of minutes
by going to the website where he claimed to get the information. People tend to have a "knee-jerk" reaction to anything the government (or doctors speaking on behalf of the government) tells you to do. People have an intrinsic mistrust of the government, but they will trust medical advice from someone who:
1) Isn't an MD
2) Makes you sign up for his mailing list to read his articles
3) Sells tanning beds, salmon, and cookware on the same website with his "medical" articles
Also, I think anyone who has a 401(k) will know that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. I've neither received the shot nor gotten the flu before, but I've gotten the shot this year and will get the H1N1 shot when available. I have an infant at home, and if her ped. says she needs one, she will be receiving the vaccine as well. If my wife, my daughter, or I got seriously sick from a preventable illness, and I didn't take the appropriate steps to prevent it, well I'd feel terrible.
Let me put it this way:
I wear a seat belt every time I'm in the car.
I've never gotten into an accident before, yet I still wear a seat belt.
It won't protect me from all bodily harm, yet I still wear a seat belt.
There is a rare chance I'll be in a situation where I'd be better off not wearing one, yet I still wear a seat belt.
So if you're not getting the vaccine, fine. I would just ask that you do the research on what I feel is an important issue before making your decision.
Wow... That was a long post. Sorry about that
