Jeff Cavanaugh wrote:Rob Coffey wrote:Jeff Cavanaugh wrote:Apparently even if the ingredients are grown in America, the beer is brewed in America by unionized Americans according to an American recipe and distributed by American workers to American consumers, it still isn't American beer if the profits go to people in Belgium.
As I said, same for Toyota (okay, the design may not be American in that case, but "American recipe" is questionable too. At least Bud likes to claim their czech roots, even if its mostly myth.)
Edit: Look at it another way -- is McDonalds local? What if the franchise is locally owned so the profits stay here? I would still so no. But Papa Johns is local. But if they sold out to McDonalds, they wouldnt be any more.
If Toyota bought Ford tomorrow, would Ford cease to be an American company? Would the Ford sitting in my neighbor's driveway become a foreign car? What about the Escape that rolls off the Louisville assembly line 10 years from now? Foreign or domestic?
Yes. No. Foreign.
Maybe the distinction is largely a meaningless one in a globalized economy.
Agreed. I think the bigger difference is between small, "craft" type (whether talking beer or restaurants or cars) and corporate type (whether beer, chain restaurants, or cars).
But I tend to think that companies that retain a substantially American character can meaningfully be called American even if their ownership goes overseas.
And what does that mean when it comes to beer, exactly? I would say that craft beer more embodies the American spirit and character than anything put out by the global corporations. Except then you get Goose Island, so YMMV. Does a cheap, american knockoff of a Czech pilsner really retain substantial American character? Maybe it does, but I would hope not.
In my mind, when your product better represents Madison Ave than it does wherever its from (St Louis, Milwaukee, Golden) then its lost its true American character. Being sold to foreign ownership is just the final nail.