Roger A. Baylor wrote:Ken B wrote:#1 rule of food and beverage pairing: drink what you like with what you like to eat. So you're already there Dan.
To follow this rule is to concede that Americans might as well be drinking Dudweiser with turkey franks. Nope, not buying it. If this discussion is based on "if it feels good, do it, irrespective of ignorance," then it is not a discussion worth having.
I don't know, even most people I know who eat nothing but junk that comes out of a box and gets nuked will concede that turkey franks are pretty terrible. And most of them drink nothing but beers you poke fun of with puns that my kindergartener could have come up with. You give no ground Roger, a trait I sometimes find admirable. But not here - that is what makes this discussion not worth having.
So there's a relatively expensive wine we sell a fair bit of. It is not a well made wine by anyone's standards, but it is popular and has label appeal. The owner of the shop I work at and I joke about it, but if it makes our customers happy, I have no problem recommending it. A coworker suggested I ought to "educate" our customers more, and offer them some wines that I think are "better". If there is even a crack of daylight, the tiniest opening, I will push a customer towards wines that I think have more character, are more well made, reflect something about what I think is great about wine. But if someone is spending $40+ on a bottle, I want them to be happy, however ignorant they may be (or I may judge them to be). While I am in retail, I consider my role the same as those in the service industry. If someone walks away happy, I have done my job, but if I try and push someone towards my own preferences rather than fulfill their wishes, and they come away dissatisfied, I have not done my job. The role of the producer is different. It is your job to make the product that fulfills your vision, even if that means pushing the envelope. I think it's fair to have an understanding that your niche, what you do, may not appeal to everyone, but it is arrogant to deride those who do not share your interests as ignorant.
Roger A. Baylor wrote:Ken B wrote:My post was not meant to be a veiled stab at you or your beers, rather what I said, at face value: a criticism of one aspect of an industry I'd like to see change.
I did not take it as such, and I was not answering based on my own beers.
I took the discussion there because though you may be the voice of the craft beer industry on this forum, I think it is a stretch to position yourself as such in any other world, including the real one. So the vitriol you leveled against seemed personal, and I aimed to take it out of that realm. I guess I was wrong, go on with your bad self, brother.
Roger A. Baylor wrote:Ken B wrote:How many are hop forward and/or high gravity? Further, how many of the American craft takes on ambers, browns, Belgian variants, session-strength ales, wheats and specialties have ibu's in excess of the classic Old World examples of those styles? My guess, not actually looking at what's there,is the majority meet my criticism. Or at least a strong plurality. Now that's veering into subjective territory, but at least we could look at ibu's and compare numbers.
Why are we looking at IBU's as the basis of this discussion?
Since you seemed to value my opinion so poorly, I offered that as an attempt at quantifying my point. More in my reply to Shane.