Adam Robinson wrote:Did some posts get deleted or edited? I can't find what has started this big argument between you two? What was the bizarre accusation in question?
If there's some history here I'm missing, my apologies. But from what I'm reading I can't quite tell where this upset is coming from.
Stephen D wrote:Brian's a great guy, but I must call into question his intentions and the 'looking down the pipe' tone he had towards me. Every word I said was heartfelt and true (to me.)
What did I just preach about? Have been on the podium for quite sometime. He's never met the man, yet he is so willing, so enthusiastic to take this life (30 years, mind you) away from him.
A concillatory 'blah-blah' only hides the true nature of the statement. You do this good, I've heard good about, people tell me that, yet you kick your dog.
All you remember is that I kick my dog.
Oldest trick in the book.
It turned here. You can have the vision to see the spirit bnehind the OP, or not. The town-crier syndrome is junk and does more harm than good.
No.
I will never be privy to such actions, especially when people's livelihoods are at stake. If you can't see through the snide comments, then its your fault- not mine.
No.
Alison Hanover wrote:I totally agreeAdam Robinson wrote:Did some posts get deleted or edited? I can't find what has started this big argument between you two? What was the bizarre accusation in question?
If there's some history here I'm missing, my apologies. But from what I'm reading I can't quite tell where this upset is coming from.
Adam Robinson wrote:As best I can tell, you just quoted yourself and responded to your own quote, as evidence of "where things turned bad." Your comments have become increasingly confusing, and they indicate I was right in my original assessment of what the problem was for you. It's not a position I philosophically share, but I understand, I think, why you feel the way you do, though your latter conclusions in the thread as to other peoples' intent seem to have no relation to comments actually posted here.
Nevertheless, I'm sure there is some history between the two of you that allows you to pierce some esoteric veil that shrouds the malice I'm not picking up on. Hope you guys work out whatever the fight was about, as it diminishes the value of what else is here, mainly, good info for any people who don't know Majid and wouldn't otherwise be able to hear or read anything other than what's in the news.
Brian Taylor Clark
Foodie
172
Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:58 am
Louisville, Ky
Brian Curl wrote:Stephen, I have no opinion on the charges, his innocence or guilt. My bizarre comment was more directed at threatening messages left on a voicemail.
I believe what has been said about the scumbag that provoked these messages and that Majid is a good guy. I am sure it is possible that Majid did not know the consequences or the law. It's unfortunate, but many times criminals or "street smart" people know how to manipulate the system and use it against good people.
I believe if it comes out that this guy has a bad reputation/record and was being harassing that there is a good chance that Majid will be exonerated.
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
Brian Curl wrote:Stephen's panties got into a wad after this post. I only have two conclusions, either he can't read and comprehend English or else he's delusional.Brian Curl wrote:Stephen, I have no opinion on the charges, his innocence or guilt. My bizarre comment was more directed at threatening messages left on a voicemail.
I believe what has been said about the scumbag that provoked these messages and that Majid is a good guy. I am sure it is possible that Majid did not know the consequences or the law. It's unfortunate, but many times criminals or "street smart" people know how to manipulate the system and use it against good people.
I believe if it comes out that this guy has a bad reputation/record and was being harassing that there is a good chance that Majid will be exonerated.
Brian Curl wrote:Stephen's panties got into a wad after this post. I only have two conclusions, either he can't read and comprehend English or else he's delusional.Brian Curl wrote:Stephen, I have no opinion on the charges, his innocence or guilt. My bizarre comment was more directed at threatening messages left on a voicemail.
I believe what has been said about the scumbag that provoked these messages and that Majid is a good guy. I am sure it is possible that Majid did not know the consequences or the law. It's unfortunate, but many times criminals or "street smart" people know how to manipulate the system and use it against good people.
I believe if it comes out that this guy has a bad reputation/record and was being harassing that there is a good chance that Majid will be exonerated.
Brian Curl wrote:Stephen's panties got into a wad after this post. I only have two conclusions, either he can't read and comprehend English or else he's delusional.
Robin Garr wrote: I believe I told you two to get a room.
Brian Curl wrote:Stephen's panties got into a wad after this post. I only have two conclusions, either he can't read and comprehend English or else he's delusional.Brian Curl wrote:Stephen, I have no opinion on the charges, his innocence or guilt. My bizarre comment was more directed at threatening messages left on a voicemail.
I believe what has been said about the scumbag that provoked these messages and that Majid is a good guy. I am sure it is possible that Majid did not know the consequences or the law. It's unfortunate, but many times criminals or "street smart" people know how to manipulate the system and use it against good people.
I believe if it comes out that this guy has a bad reputation/record and was being harassing that there is a good chance that Majid will be exonerated.
Users browsing this forum: AmazonBot 2, Bytespider, Claudebot and 8 guests