
John Hagan wrote: I'd go along with that.
Alison Hanover wrote:then your post should look like this..............................
OK
Alison Hanover wrote:Oops sorry,
Alison Hanover wrote:I cannot believe I put you're instead of your. That is one of my biggest pet peeves.
Marsha L. wrote:In my opinion - why isn't everyone watching my rerun of Secrets on Channel 21 right now?
JustinHammond wrote:Marsha L. wrote:In my opinion - why isn't everyone watching my rerun of Secrets on Channel 21 right now?
Because I watched it the first time. That was some fancy shrimp and grits.
Robin Garr wrote:John Hagan wrote: I'd go along with that.
Since "foodie" is one of the forum "ranks" and we use the term here often, along with "locavore," I might as well express my opinion.
I think they're useful words, and I think Wiki glances on but doesn't quite hit the main point: It's a useful umbrella term for people who are interested in food - both amateur and in the business - and it is much less snobby and sniffy than language like "gourmet" or "connoisseur." It's not about pro vs. amateur, it's about a short, snappy catch-all term that doesn't carry a high-and-mighty implication. That's my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Facebook and 7 guests