annemarie m wrote:i do agree with your stance on papa johns.
Tony P. wrote:All I know is that we have over 80 employees who have jobs, and we are paying our taxes and doing our part to help support this community. So you can "tag" us however you see fit. Regardless of our size or where we expand to, we will never, NEVER, compromise our standards and quality. I hope to see in one our our restaurants, wherever they are locatedTony
Deb Hall
Foodie
4169
Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm
Highlands , Louisville
MikeG wrote:Chain itself isnt a dirty word, just because you personally have negative connotations associated witht he word doesnt change it's definition. Yeah BoomBozz has grown to chain status, so what? As long as the product doesnt suffer so be it. And if it means there will finally be one near me in Jeff (Hey there's open development right off 65 near a truly evil chain, Wal-Mart), bring on the growth.
Michael Mattingly wrote:I'll continue to support Boombozz until they expand outside of Kentucky. After that, in my book, they're a chain, regardless of where they started & what they have to offer. However, in the end, it comes down to money & you can't blame them for wanting more of it.
MikeG wrote:So by that logic if you like one basketball team but not 5 others the one you like shoudlnt be called a basketball team?
JustinHammond wrote:MikeG wrote:So by that logic if you like one basketball team but not 5 others the one you like shoudlnt be called a basketball team?
Nope, but with one owner, in one city, and 5 independent locations I don't consider it a chain. It doesn't matter what you, I, or Anne Marie call it, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't being put in the same category as the big guys with crappy pizza. I don't consider Bristol or Wicks a chain either and I don't like Wicks pizza. Me liking Boombozz has nothing to do with labeling it. In fact there are some chain pizzas I enjoy, Snappy Tomato is the first that comes to mind.
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot and 3 guests