Matthew D wrote: 1. The tables are too close. Reminded me of Mojito's which I avoid because I found the space too busy. It's not "too too close," but I do think they could lose a few tables. I mention this as a favor to people like me who seemed to really be bothered by this (am I the only one?).
I'm thinking that since they're struggling as is to get the seating capacity high enough for a liquor license, they don't have plans to remove seating from the main dining room. I see your point, though. It wasn't crowded at all when we went, so I didn't really notice it, but at capacity it could be an issue. Some people prefer this, however, and many tapas joints I've been to strive for an overcrowded, lively atmosphere (think Mojito or BARcelona in St. Louis if you've ever been).
Matthew D wrote: 3. I would like to see the plates to include portions divisible by 2. The place is steup with 4-tops to accommodate couples and four-person groups, so it might make sense to make the plates work better for such dining groups. Both the shrimp and the oysters featured five items on the plate. As I was with my mom and she is the person who taught me how to share, we were able to battle through this small annoyance without either of us stabbing the other over the "final" portion. Is there something aesthetic about odd numbers and plating that I am not aware of?
This frustrates me as well, and seems commonplace at tapas places. St. Louis was chock full of tapas joints, and all inevitably served odd-numbered portions. It never made sense. Generally my wife and I end up either trying to cut the 3rd (or 5th or whatever) down the middle, or she relents and lets me eat it.