Robin Garr wrote: Here's a funny idea ... everyone who lives within range of that Mickey Dee's, over the next few days, ought to go in and politely ask, "Could you tell us the manager's name"? About the 50th time that happens, it would be interesting to see the reaction.
John Hagan
Foodie
1416
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:38 pm
SPENCER CO. Lake Wazzapamani
Becky M wrote: So we headed to McDonalds on Taylorsville Rd., McDonalds Lakeside i believe it is called.
Nimbus Couzin wrote:
-Nimbus, proud vegetarian who WILL NOT support McD's......I encourage ya'll to join me. For ethical reasons.
Mark Head wrote:Nothing in this story particularly surprises me. McDonald's IMO isn't a restaurant in the strict sense - it's more like a "feeding trough". I know someone who manages a Burger King - they do have grave concerns regarding their safety at night. Even if this manager is fired - my guess is they will have a job next week in another fast food operation. Sad state of affairs indeed.
Will Gaines wrote:Mark Head wrote:Nothing in this story particularly surprises me. McDonald's IMO isn't a restaurant in the strict sense - it's more like a "feeding trough". I know someone who manages a Burger King - they do have grave concerns regarding their safety at night. Even if this manager is fired - my guess is they will have a job next week in another fast food operation. Sad state of affairs indeed.
I couldn't have said it better myself. I especially like the "feeding trough" touch.
Matthew D
Foodie
1347
Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am
No Longer Old Louisville
Kim H wrote:I believe this is the kind of attitude that Becky was hoping to avoid. We all know that McDonald's isn't fine dining, by any stretch, but it, and ALL restaurants, are in the service industry. The behavior of this manager was absolutely reprehensible, by any standards. It was obvious to me that she (the mgr) was not at all concerned about safety, she was concerned about getting the heck outta there. If she was truly concerned about safety, it seems to me that she would have made eye contact, watched the patrons instead of staring at the computer, and definitely wouldn't turn the lights out!!! She is simply in the wrong job, has a terrible attitude, hates something about her own life, and takes it out on others. And if clearing the restaurant by 11 was truly an issue, she simply could've said something like, "We'd be happy to serve your food, but we close in 10 minutes, so it would have to be to-go." I probably would've been a little disappointed, having a big group like that with me, but I would've accepted it, and would never really have considered it an issue. This woman has a chip on her shoulder, and needs to find a new job.
Matthew D wrote:Kim H wrote:I believe this is the kind of attitude that Becky was hoping to avoid. We all know that McDonald's isn't fine dining, by any stretch, but it, and ALL restaurants, are in the service industry. The behavior of this manager was absolutely reprehensible, by any standards. It was obvious to me that she (the mgr) was not at all concerned about safety, she was concerned about getting the heck outta there. If she was truly concerned about safety, it seems to me that she would have made eye contact, watched the patrons instead of staring at the computer, and definitely wouldn't turn the lights out!!! She is simply in the wrong job, has a terrible attitude, hates something about her own life, and takes it out on others. And if clearing the restaurant by 11 was truly an issue, she simply could've said something like, "We'd be happy to serve your food, but we close in 10 minutes, so it would have to be to-go." I probably would've been a little disappointed, having a big group like that with me, but I would've accepted it, and would never really have considered it an issue. This woman has a chip on her shoulder, and needs to find a new job.
It's too easy to single out the manager as the source of the problem. I'm not defending or apologizing for her actions, but, at the end of the day, the major fault is with McDonald's(or the franchise owner), not the manager. The business decided to hire this person and, in turn, is responsible for the actions of this person. While it is true that the "manager is simply in the wrong," the larger wrong probably has to do with the way in which employees don't feel valued by the companies that employ them, and, in turn, feel zero responsibility to give a damn about how they represent this particular company. Welcome to corporate America!
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest