Ed Vermillion
Foodie
1765
Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:32 pm
38 degrees 25' 25' N 85 degrees 36' 2' W
Robin Garr wrote:Ed Vermillion wrote:A food/health permit is a good thing. I don't know how hard it is to get one but I prefer that some basic standard of cleanliness and food prep is going on. Why should a double standard exist between static and mobile food purveyors?
Because if you buy from a mobile food purveyor it can be assumed that you're making a personal decision to judge risk for yourself rather than relying on the regulatory process to do so. It's a fringe economy, frankly, and I'm not sure that it's necessary to stamp it out bureaucratically when it's not likely to attract the market that lines up at Mickey D's.
Ron Johnson wrote:Let's not have another Gallo Rosso situation.
Ed Vermillion wrote:All that being fine by me (and people pick where to eat on there own everyday) it still begs the question:
If Dean & Leah & Andrew & Fernando & (fill in the blank) need to comply with the myriad business & health laws to stay in business why should a convenient, fringe economy food purveyor not have their stall inspected for whatever minimal standard for food safety exists?
You frequently mention the gastric nightmare that you experienced with bad homemade mayo in South America; perhaps preventing that from happening here is the point. I have no plan to blow the whistle on them as I have eaten questionable food in dirty locales before (not saying that they are either one). I'm just saying that having to follow the same level playing field standards as everybody else trying to survive in the food business doesn't beg for a pejorative rejoinder when the question arises.
Ed Vermillion wrote:All that being fine by me (and people pick where to eat on there own everyday) it still begs the question:
Ed Vermillion wrote:If Dean & Leah & Andrew & Fernando & (fill in the blank) need to comply with the myriad business & health laws to stay in business why should a convenient, fringe economy food purveyor not have their stall inspected for whatever minimal standard for food safety exists?
Sarita C wrote:This is the last and final thing I'm going to say. I do not know if the health department has paid them a visit or vice versa. I do know that the trailer is equipped with a sink, soap and hand sanitizer and the meat is kept heated. I have been in Louisville restaurants that were in far worse shape and that are regulated by the health department. The same two women do the cooking there and it appears to be a clean operation.
The real point I'm trying to make with this post was the Gorditas and Tamales are very good and I wondered if anyone else has tried it. Geese.
Sarita C wrote:The real point I'm trying to make with this post was the Gorditas and Tamales are very good and I wondered if anyone else has tried it. Geese.
Sarita C wrote:I'll post if I see them out there this weekend. It's really disappointing when you are craving it and they are not there.
Charles W. wrote:Ed Vermillion wrote:All that being fine by me (and people pick where to eat on there own everyday) it still begs the question:
[rant]It actually doesn't "beg" any question (sorry, but one of my pet peeves is the complete abandoment of what "begging the question" means.) It may "demand an answer" or "raise the question," but unless the proposition to be proven is assumed in the premise, it doesn't "beg the question."[/rant]
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 1 guest