easily amused, are we?Gary Z wrote:Yeah, yeah... lighten up. The phrase "pale Dickensian nightmare" just struck me as funny.

easily amused, are we?Gary Z wrote:Yeah, yeah... lighten up. The phrase "pale Dickensian nightmare" just struck me as funny.
Deb Hall
Foodie
4169
Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm
Highlands , Louisville
Willie Myers wrote:easily amused, are we?Gary Z wrote:Yeah, yeah... lighten up. The phrase "pale Dickensian nightmare" just struck me as funny.
Deb Hall wrote:Tina,
Totally legit comments- especially given your experience.![]()
On the flip-side, I actually had an acquaintance once send back her food because there was fresh tomato on her sandwich. ( she had told them no tomato, but they made a mistake.) Claimed a "tomato allergy", then said to me that she just really disliked them...Personally I would have just taken it off.![]()
Deb
Deb Hall
Foodie
4169
Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm
Highlands , Louisville
Deb Hall wrote:Steve,
I believe you. My point was she claimed to the server that she " had an allergy" -when she didn't. That's part of what increases the confusion about the severity of some real food allergies.
Deb
Carla G wrote:Doug Davis wrote:Gary Z wrote:Yeah, yeah... lighten up. The phrase "pale Dickensian nightmare" just struck me as funny. I'm sure all your dietary restrictions are serious and should be treated with the utmost gravity.
You will learn when you experience a severe food allergy. We're not talking itchy hives here, we're talking about a persons' esophagus swelling up and breaking off their breathing and it can happen within a minute or two of coming into contact with an allergen. And with so much gene splicing and genetic food engineering it's becoming a more widespread problem. It's just not what you want to be flip about.
.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefsbot, Anthony G, Claudebot, Facebook, SemrushBot and 3 guests