Deb Hall wrote: Maybe we can all try to encourage participation, not continue in these arguments about people's words- and get some interesting conversations going on this Forum.
That's fine Deb. I'll point out that you addressed me in this thread.

You told me Rob was correct except my issue with Rob had nothing to do with his discourse about the types of meat.
My issue was with him telling the OP something as fact when it was based only on his assumption. This was not an isolated instance, but three in a row. That distinction is either lost on you or you just prefer to ignore it.
By all means, get back to the discussions you are more interested in. I remind you again, you addressed me here and I am replying. Will addressed me and I replied. I think that's the civil thing to do.
The discussions we are interested in may not always be the same but you are always welcome to participate. I will not take offense when you express your opinion. I ask that you tolerate mine as well. If someone represents opinion as fact then they should be prepared to defend that opinion.
Otherwise we are all just making statements.
Cheers Deb!