Steve P wrote: ... Me thinks that rather than attempting to make clarifications about what is and what is not Kobe Beef (and I DO stand by what I said in that regard...Your link proved nothing) ..,
I'm not getting into this to defend Robin ... he's a big boy and can take care of himself.
But, Steve, I don't understand how you can say that the article Robin linked-to proved nothing -- unless it is your opinion that the linked article was a lie or poorly researched? As you probably know, that link led to what was part one of a series of four articles on the subject. I read all four. Completely. I did not check the author's cited references and assume they say what he said they say. He clearly states, and cites official USDA regulations that have forbade the importation of any beef from Japan since 2010. He clearly states many times that "Wagyu" is a descriptive word meaning any Japanese cow. Thus, Wagyu beef is beef from a Japanese-sourced cow. To extend it to U.S beef, it more or less means beef from a cow that came from Japan and one part of the articles goes on to describe the degree of affinity the U.S. cow has to have to its Japanese ancestors. But, in any event, it is not a breed of cattle, let alone anything that qualifies as Kobe beef under Japanese law. And, as the Japanese make the Kobe beef, it seems only fair that they get to decide what defines it.
So, with all due respect, how does the linked article not prove that there is no Kobe beef in the U.S or that Wagyu beef is anything other than beef from cows with a certain degree of relationship with any old cow that lived at one time in Japan?
My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.