Steve P wrote:DARN IT !!!...Someone who (apparently) has their thumb on the pulse of this whole debacle posted a very informative response to this thread and then they quick like a bunny pulled it down.
Out of respect for this forum, I took down my original post. However, in light of the seriousness of the situation and the viral effect these days, I am done biting my tongue.The spirit behind the article presented to Chef Lewellyn, by Mr. Moss, was presented as a 'feel good' article about the restaurant and what the plan was for its return. The writer earned a level of trust from Jayson that we all, including his parents, were understandably suspicious. This trust was cultivated over the course of many interviews, emails and calls, including a photo shoot. Anyone who knows Jayson, knows how private and introverted he is. Now all of a sudden, he's some kind of flashy guy, some kind of Jeff Ruby character? Please, don’t buy it for a second.
I was interviewed by Mr. Moss and his editor-in-chief, and I expressed concerns that this story would take a negative and gossip-like twist. I was assured that would not be the case by them both. I followed the emails between them and witnessed J being excited about the opportunity. Many of the comments in this story were partial statements, taken out of context and loaded, adding insult to injury and tarnishing him more so than this home-town saga already has. An alarming majority of folks quoted in the article have expressed their dissatisfaction in how their comments were presented in a negative light. The article's slant, bias and the levels of inaccuracy are alarmingly libelous. The direction of the slant is incredibly concerning, given how Jayson was approached, and then that he was interviewing with Mr. Moss up till the time of its deadline. I have wondered if the quotes were the final pieces to fill in for a story already written.
I'm sure no one is really surprised by the clear agenda behind the content, particularly in relation to the special interests that drive the publication. It shows his counterparts will go to any length at their disposal to disguise the truth and their fault in the situation, not to mention that journalism is pretty much up for grabs in this market. I've grown so tired of keeping quiet, mostly under request, as this saga gets misreported and lives interrupted. I have been front row and center since inception of the business and their relationship together. Personally, I don't want to hear another thing about 732 Social until the civil action is complete. I have watched Jayson sacrifice part of himself in attempting to save Social, all the while still trying to foster good will through community ventures. I've said it before, I guess no good deed goes unpunished.
Now, due to Mr. Moss' demonstration of comic book 'journalism', good luck in getting J to come up for air. At this point, his guarded and unresponsive status is very understandable. Clearly the facts aren't going to be represented without bias, so it may be best that nothing gets reported at all. How in the world does a partnership/landlord dispute get this type of media?! and 6 months after the business closes?! If one were to take an unbiased look at what is happening in the space at 732 East Market Street, I think the obvious answer will come to you. No reporting needed.
I'll save my judgment until after it finds a courtroom. Until then, if it seems questionable Louisville, I would question the source.