Pat Costas wrote:The rule does not offer protection for brick and mortar establishments. It allows a food truck to set up 14 days with owner of property permission of course. Then 30 days later you can set up again for 14 days? How is that protecting the brick and mortar. If an established restaurant didn't want the competition of a food truck they could very simply let the owner of the property know that they don't want us there and wa la no permission to set up, problem sovled. In our situation we pay rent for a little piece of asphalt whethewr we are there or not. Bottom line is the fourteen day rule needs to be stricken from the books. I just have no clue as to how to go about getting it changed,
Pat Costas wrote:The rule does not offer protection for brick and mortar establishments. It allows a food truck to set up 14 days with owner of property permission of course. Then 30 days later you can set up again for 14 days? How is that protecting the brick and mortar. If an established restaurant didn't want the competition of a food truck they could very simply let the owner of the property know that they don't want us there and wa la no permission to set up, problem sovled. In our situation we pay rent for a little piece of asphalt whethewr we are there or not. Bottom line is the fourteen day rule needs to be stricken from the books. I just have no clue as to how to go about getting it changed,
Steve H wrote:This sounds more like a city ordinance issue. Has anybody confirmed it's a state regulation going on a wild goose chase?
Mark R wrote:I wonder if the fact that you are paying for the space makes any difference? Or if you actually owned it? It seems like it would be very different than just setting up someplace. It seems like it should basically put you in the same category as a restaurant! I'm sure the regulators don't see it that way but by using common sense (I know politicians don't have any) you would think that would put you in a different category especially since you lease it all the time.
Maggie H wrote:I'm pretty sure you're technically not supposed to set up within 250 ft. of another restaurant.
Maggie H wrote:The idea is that it's supposed to protect brick and mortar establishments from a truck setting up shop in front of or near them, while they're paying rent, for their building. Blah blah.
Stan Chase wrote:I'm 99% sure its a state law. The way I understand it is the good people in Frankfort don't take well to "city folk" from Louisville coming in trying to change state laws. The other hysterical law is the plumbing/sink issue. You can read more about that (and much more) here :
Steve P wrote:Currently being the key word there.
Derrick Dones wrote:Just curious, what makes a mobile food vendor riff raff or rogue? I haven't seen any Palin trunks. DD
Matt Davis wrote:
Blah Blah is absolutely right. I have heard the lease/property tax argument many times and my only response is a list of the things I am responsible for annually. 2 sets of brakes or more, 2 sets of tires,
Matt Davis wrote:Just ask Adam Colvin with Busta Grill... he already had to have one run off for trying to steal his corner.
Steve P wrote:Am I the only one who sees the irony in this ?
Robin Garr wrote:Steve P wrote:Am I the only one who sees the irony in this ?
Maybe?
Steve P wrote: Am I the only one who sees the irony in this ?
Matt Davis wrote:Ya know what. Steve is the exact reason I dont even want to come on these forums anymore.
Congrats Steve, you are the king of the message boards. Loser.
Users browsing this forum: AmazonBot 2, Claudebot and 4 guests