Kyle L wrote:Cat fight!
Dog actually.
Kyle L wrote:Cat fight!
Steve H wrote:I
Some animals are more equal than others.
Steve P wrote:Steve H wrote:I
Some animals are more equal than others.
Depends. Are we talking Chinese restaurants ?
Deb Hall
Foodie
4169
Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm
Highlands , Louisville
Marybeth B wrote:Spray painting something on the inside of a building you expect to burn up doesn't make sense.
Marybeth B wrote:Spray painting something on the inside of a building you expect to burn up doesn't make sense.
Marybeth B wrote:I never expected anyone in this forum to use a vulgar sexual term to refer to people whose politics they disagreed with.
Marsha L. wrote: The first big day for this movement was Tax Day, April 15. And organizers had a gimmick. They asked people to send a tea bag to the Oval Office. One of the exhortations was “Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.” A protester was spotted with a sign saying, “Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You.” So, conservatives started it: started with this terminology."
Marsha L. wrote:Marybeth B wrote:I never expected anyone in this forum to use a vulgar sexual term to refer to people whose politics they disagreed with.
Sorry, Marybeth, but...
"Moreover, as Jay Nordlinger at National Review admits, the term "teabagger" was introduced to the political lexicon by Tea Party movement leaders:
The first big day for this movement was Tax Day, April 15. And organizers had a gimmick. They asked people to send a tea bag to the Oval Office. One of the exhortations was “Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.” A protester was spotted with a sign saying, “Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You.” So, conservatives started it: started with this terminology."
Steve H wrote:I've seen many vulgar things, on many vulgar signs, held up by many vulgar people. Does this mean it is now OK to be vulgar here?
Seriously, I can say whatever I want, as long as I've seen it on a sign before? Really?
Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Facebook, Heather L and 4 guests