Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.
no avatar
User

Ed Vermillion

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1765

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:32 pm

Location

38 degrees 25' 25' N 85 degrees 36' 2' W

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Ed Vermillion » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:44 pm

Mark Head wrote:
Ed Vermillion wrote:"What I don't get is why anybody outside that one-on-one relationship should CARE." Robin Garr


Sorry, I'm very bad about the quote thingy when it involves multiple quotes.

I'm sure what Robin cares about and what I deeply care about is everyone being treated equally. I support anyone loving each other and choosing their partner. I believe that the rights inherent in ANY marrieage should apply to all. Spousal health care, power of attorney, visiting/making health decisions, raising children, being recognized publicly in our society as a couple, being afforded the same degree of care and respect as any other couple.

I do agree with Robin that it is no one's business if we all had a level playing field. We seem to forget that we are discussing a human rights issue, not a business plan. Is it permissible for any of us to deny human rights based on a business plan? No. Pure and simple.

While many obfuscate the basic premise under the guise of semantics it still remains a basic question: Why would a basic human right be opposed?

Spare me the free speech and individual opinion argument under a generalization context. Explain to me why you are opposed to two people, regardless of sex, joining in a civil/religious partnership?


I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure that legal marriage is a "basic human right". For example you can't marry your brother, sister, mother, father, multiple people, someone under the age of consent, etc. So their clearly are legal limitations - basic rights are like speech, religion, etc.

I can't recall anyone who's been outwardly or stringently opposed to gay marriage on this thread so I'm not sure who you are addressing - the thread was originally about a chicken joint that caters to the Christian right. I think several here find the mix of politics and food distasteful - no pun intended.


Oh, well...sorry about all that. I thought we were discussing stuff. Go back to talking about chicken tenders and all that. Sorry Mark, er...sorry Dr. Head I'm forgetting my place.
no avatar
User

Mark Head

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1729

Joined

Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:44 pm

Location

Prospect

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Mark Head » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:16 pm

Ed Vermillion wrote:
Mark Head wrote:
Ed Vermillion wrote:"What I don't get is why anybody outside that one-on-one relationship should CARE." Robin Garr


Sorry, I'm very bad about the quote thingy when it involves multiple quotes.

I'm sure what Robin cares about and what I deeply care about is everyone being treated equally. I support anyone loving each other and choosing their partner. I believe that the rights inherent in ANY marrieage should apply to all. Spousal health care, power of attorney, visiting/making health decisions, raising children, being recognized publicly in our society as a couple, being afforded the same degree of care and respect as any other couple.

I do agree with Robin that it is no one's business if we all had a level playing field. We seem to forget that we are discussing a human rights issue, not a business plan. Is it permissible for any of us to deny human rights based on a business plan? No. Pure and simple.

While many obfuscate the basic premise under the guise of semantics it still remains a basic question: Why would a basic human right be opposed?

Spare me the free speech and individual opinion argument under a generalization context. Explain to me why you are opposed to two people, regardless of sex, joining in a civil/religious partnership?


I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure that legal marriage is a "basic human right". For example you can't marry your brother, sister, mother, father, multiple people, someone under the age of consent, etc. So their clearly are legal limitations - basic rights are like speech, religion, etc.

I can't recall anyone who's been outwardly or stringently opposed to gay marriage on this thread so I'm not sure who you are addressing - the thread was originally about a chicken joint that caters to the Christian right. I think several here find the mix of politics and food distasteful - no pun intended.


Oh, well...sorry about all that. I thought we were discussing stuff. Go back to talking about chicken tenders and all that. Sorry Mark, er...sorry Dr. Head I'm forgetting my place.


We are discussing stuff - and there are too many angles for me to keep track of. Sorry if I offended you in any way - don't hold my profession against me.
no avatar
User

Antonia L

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

880

Joined

Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:28 am

Location

Cherokee Triangle

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Antonia L » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:57 pm

Mark Head wrote:I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure that legal marriage is a "basic human right".


Maybe not "basic human right" - but who gets to decide what those are, anyway? What we do have in writing is the Constitution... more specifically, the 14th Amendment... and the Equal Protection Clause.

And now, back to your regularly scheduled chicken nugget platter.
no avatar
User

Matthew D

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1347

Joined

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am

Location

No Longer Old Louisville

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Matthew D » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:56 pm

I'm back in town, and the fun has ended....
Thinks the frosty mug is the low point in American history.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23218

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Robin Garr » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:57 pm

Matthew D wrote:I'm back in town, and the fun has ended....

Well, now that you've popped it back up to the top ... :?
no avatar
User

Matthew D

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1347

Joined

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:22 am

Location

No Longer Old Louisville

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Matthew D » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:59 pm

Robin Garr wrote:
Matthew D wrote:I'm back in town, and the fun has ended....

Well, now that you've popped it back up to the top ... :?


If I knew that's what would happen when I responded, I would have refrained from responding. :lol:
Thinks the frosty mug is the low point in American history.
no avatar
User

Brian Curl

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

119

Joined

Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:38 pm

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Brian Curl » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:29 pm

Chick fil A gives me heart burn, not sure what it is in their breading - msg maybe? :x
no avatar
User

Greg R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

180

Joined

Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:15 am

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: Chick-Fil-A lays it on the line: They don't like gay cou

by Greg R. » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:44 pm

Brian Curl wrote:Chick fil A gives me heart burn, not sure what it is in their breading - msg maybe? :x


Funny. I can't tolerate it either and I have an iron stomach. I've never heard anyone else say anything so I figured it was just me -some sort of fluke compatability issue. I do just fine with MSG in other food so it must be something else. The only other food I have ever had an issue with (and I eat everything - twice!) is fried turkey (not fried anything else).
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claudebot, Facebook and 6 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign