Welcome to the Louisville Restaurants Forum, a civil place for the intelligent discussion of the local restaurant scene and just about any other topic related to food and drink in and around Louisville.

Chick-Fil-A under fire again

no avatar
User

Steve H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1406

Joined

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:27 pm

Location

Neanderthals rock!

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve H » Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:51 am

Carla G wrote:I will fight for my child's rights endlessly.

Your child is lucky to have you. And I really mean it.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

{ RANK }

Forum host

Posts

23211

Joined

Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:38 pm

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Robin Garr » Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:53 am

Steve H wrote:You are the one who brought in the Klan equivalence.
:roll:

Did you mean something else?

Yeah, actually, I did. Klan activity can extend from picketing to demonstrating to symbolic terrorism to lynching. So can organized anti-gay activity by the extreme type of organization that rates SPLC's "Hate Group" rating. Ever hear of Matthew Shepard?

Not all Klan activity leads to murder; nor does all extremist anti-gay activity. But the extremism holds open the possibility of violence, and the hate starts down that road. You seem to be suggesting an equivalency between those who support inclusion and those who support exclusion. That's false equvalency, and it's morally and ethically worth attending to Burke's counsel to stand up against it.
no avatar
User

Steve H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1406

Joined

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:27 pm

Location

Neanderthals rock!

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve H » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:12 am

Robin Garr wrote:
Steve H wrote:You are the one who brought in the Klan equivalence.
:roll:

Did you mean something else?

Yeah, actually, I did. Klan activity can extend from picketing to demonstrating to symbolic terrorism to lynching. So can organized anti-gay activity by the extreme type of organization that rates SPLC's "Hate Group" rating. Ever hear of Matthew Shepard?

So, did the murderers of Matthew Shepard contribute to the same groups as the Chik-Fil-A folks? Did the Chik-Fil-A folks contribute to the murder? It's not fair to lump these together.

Robin Garr wrote:Not all Klan activity leads to murder; nor does all extremist anti-gay activity. But the extremism holds open the possibility of violence, and the hate starts down that road.

I still don't understand why you think hate is the only reason to oppose same sex marriage.

Robin Garr wrote:You seem to be suggesting an equivalency between those who support inclusion and those who support exclusion.

Not really. I believe there is such a thing as Freedom of Association. It's not clear to me that Government interference with that is a net gain over the long run. Let's say that I remain malleable on this point.

Robin Garr wrote:That's false equvalency, and it's morally and ethically worth attending to Burke's counsel to stand up against it.

I'm trying not to make a moral judgement, because different folks have different moral values. Many of the those who consider the Chick-Fil-A Folks haters will also espouse a multi-cultural perspective, whereby other cultures should be understood in their own terms.

This privilege seems to be extended to every culture except those who support traditional American culture in general, and the Christian Right in particular. Instead, these folks are haters, always haters. The vilest terrorist must be understood in his cultural milieu, but Chik-Fil-A be haters.

I find this contradiction interesting. I tried to stay out of this thread. Really, I did.
no avatar
User

Ray Griffith

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

442

Joined

Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:39 pm

Location

Highlands

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Ray Griffith » Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:50 pm

Image
no avatar
User

Steve H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1406

Joined

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:27 pm

Location

Neanderthals rock!

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve H » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:21 pm

Image
no avatar
User

John Greenup

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

727

Joined

Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:03 pm

Location

Oldham County

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by John Greenup » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:01 pm

I don't particularly have a problem with same-sex marriage (as an attorney, I welcome any potential expansion of my client base)...nor do I have a problem with CFA's Spicy Chicken Sandwich and Waffle Fries...so, both may co-exist as far as I'm concerned.
Last edited by John Greenup on Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I want to go where the hand of man has never set foot."

-- Samuel Goldwyn
no avatar
User

Jeff Cavanaugh

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1013

Joined

Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:49 am

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Jeff Cavanaugh » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:59 pm

Reviewing the list of "anti-gay" groups to which CFA has donated (http://equalitymatters.org/factcheck/201207020001), the only one there that SPLC has designated a hate group is the Family Research Council, and they only gave FRC $1000. Which is troubling, but small potatoes compared to the nearly $2 million given to other groups like FCA, for which "anti-gay" is a stretch.
no avatar
User

Steve Shade

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1364

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:53 am

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve Shade » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:47 pm

Without a doubt same sex marriage should be legal. Same with adoption by same sex couples.

There is absolutely no reason why they should miss the chance to experience all of the trials and tribulations of marriage and children including divorce. Or for that matter the good things.

That is the NATURAL LAW.
"Don't accept your dog's admiration as
conclusive evidence that you are wonderful."
-- Ann Landers
no avatar
User

Andrew Mellman

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1700

Joined

Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:33 am

Location

Louisville

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Andrew Mellman » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:45 pm

Steve H wrote:He's a question....

Let's say you have an employee who is exemplary in every measure, and then you find out he advocates against same sex marriage. Should he be fired?



If (s)he advocates wearing your company "uniform", says he represents your company, and (as, let's say, store manager) refuses to hire or promote anyone with different views, then (assuming you disagree) yes! If s/he advocates on own time as a private individual, then who cares! (although in Kentucky it's your choice as head of the company)

Mr. Cathy is speaking out in his role as president of CFA, and uses his specific criteria in hiring managers and in selecting franchisees. He does not just speak as a private individual. Therefore, he is advocating against the "gay lifestyle" as part & parcel of his business philosophy and business practice. If you disagree, don't patronize them.

If you are White Castle, donating minimally to your congressman John Boehner's PAC, not broadcasting or telling anyone that this is what you are doing, and do not use neo-conservative practices in your business activities, then (to Robin's point) I may or may not boycott your business, but I wouldn't make a huge deal either way.
Andrew Mellman
no avatar
User

RonnieD

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1931

Joined

Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:09 pm

Location

The rolling acres of Henry County

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by RonnieD » Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:45 pm

Steve H, I think I will understand your position better if you can explain to me in what way same sex marriage is immoral.
Is there a reason apart from immorality that would justify the condemnation of same sex marriage?

For the record, from my understanding "morality" is defined as conduct that is deemed to have merit or value within a culture. A crude understanding would be to say that something is moral because it is right and proper, although that invokes broader meanings of value that border on absolutism despite being fairly vague, which has been reasonably challenged by post-modernism, so I am not quite as comfortable with that understanding.
Ronnie Dingman
Chef Consultant
The Farm
La Center, KY
no avatar
User

Steve H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1406

Joined

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:27 pm

Location

Neanderthals rock!

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve H » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:08 pm

RonnieD wrote:Steve H, I think I will understand your position better if you can explain to me in what way same sex marriage is immoral.
Is there a reason apart from immorality that would justify the condemnation of same sex marriage
I'm not really opposed to same sex marriage. I didn't mean to give that impression.

My main point is that the Chick-Fil-A folks, and others, have reasons to oppose same sex marriage that do not involve hate, or hating. And I don't think it's fair to categorize them with slavers, murderers, lynchers, and Nazis. In fact, I find these to be odious slanders.

There's plenty of information out there about the philosophy of those who oppose same sex marriage, at least for those who can see past their hate.
no avatar
User

Scott Davis

{ RANK }

Just got here

Posts

6

Joined

Mon May 24, 2010 8:22 pm

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Scott Davis » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:17 pm

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/07/24/t ... ntroversy/ The tolerant ones now threaten to deny permits to open new business. Going to eat at Chik-fil-a every chance I get just because its good and the service is great.
no avatar
User

Steve H

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

1406

Joined

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:27 pm

Location

Neanderthals rock!

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Steve H » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:21 pm

Scott Davis wrote:http://www.humanevents.com/2012/07/24/the-chick-fil-a-gay-marriage-controversy/ The tolerant ones now threaten to deny permits to open new business. Going to eat at Chik-fil-a every chance I get just because its good and the service is great.


Good article. Thanks for posting.
no avatar
User

Carla G

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

3157

Joined

Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:01 am

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Carla G » Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:04 am

I never got an answe as to why anyone should vote to ban others from basic human rights when it doesn't concern or affect them. It's a little like me being opposed to eating liver and voting to make cooking and eating liver illeagle for those that do enjoy it.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid= ... e=1&ref=nf
"She did not so much cook as assassinate food." - Storm Jameson
no avatar
User

Greg R.

{ RANK }

Foodie

Posts

180

Joined

Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:15 am

Location

Crescent Hill

Re: Chick-Fil-A under fire again

by Greg R. » Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:48 am

Carla G wrote:I never got an answe as to why anyone should vote to ban others from basic human rights when it doesn't concern or affect them. It's a little like me being opposed to eating liver and voting to make cooking and eating liver illeagle for those that do enjoy it.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid= ... e=1&ref=nf[


Maybe you didn't get an answer because there is no one posting here that is opposed to gay marriage?

If you want an answer though perhaps you could send an e-mail to to the White House and ask Obama why he has held this position of "extreme hatred" ( :roll: ) for so many years. Apparently he was just talked over to the "enlightened side" a month or so ago by one (or was it both?) of his daughters. Holy S#it. :lol:

The question I want an answer to is why we allow the government to be involved in marriage at all. A tax break for married couples? Puh-leeze. Or, in my case, a tax INCREASE for getting married (I'll give that a double WTF?). If your church wants to marry you, whoever or whatever you are, then great. Why does the government even need to know about it?
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claudebot and 4 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign