Chris M wrote:I know for a fact that some chains offer specials.
I had the special at Bonefish just this weekend. It was quite delicious. Maybe it was a corporate mandated "special" made with ingredients they bought in bulk, but it was a special in every sense of the term, and executed very well.
.
Chris M wrote: it reads a little like PR fluff. If a PR person from Texas Roadhouse wanted to write an insiders piece about the challenges and successes of running a chain, would you be as willing to pose it?
BDKollker
Foodie
78
Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:38 pm
Outside the Box Nashvegas
I don't see the issue here. The kind of chef-driven, on-the-spot "special" she's talking about is just not going to happen in a corporate setting. You may get a "special" on the menu, and it may be good, but it's an entirely separate category.
andrew mellman wrote:
I know that many chain "specials" are mandated, but also know that these chains look at what is fresh, and like to pick 'specials' utilizing the freshest produce of the season, fresh seafood, whatever, which doesn't lessen their impact. Many chains will also offer "specials" as a way to test market menu update items, but again these will be the freshest items (and sometimes you will see them on the following year's "regular" menu for the season). I will agree that chains offering local specials are few, but they also exist.
robert szappanos wrote:Wrong Jeremy....I was just stating the facts.....I am sure that with out a doubt I eat at more chains then anyone on this site including the hos...and I know that they do offer specials that are not part of the regular menu.....Thats a fact jack....
Jeremy J wrote:Did you even read my post?
Marsha L. wrote:I meant to give the reader a peek behind the kitchen door. It's not that we're rewarded for making the most money for the restaurant from a certain special; it's that we compete to see who can conceive, execute and write an enticing enough description of our special (also an easy enough description to get the serving staff to repeat it without omissions) to get the most diners to order it.
My column isn't intended to be an indie-versus-chain spotlight every week. It's an industry-perspective column to provide adventurous diners with tips and insider-ish info that will make them savvier restaurant patrons. Since I'm the one writing it, and I've never worked in a chain restaurant, naturally there will be more content from an independent restaurant employee perspective, but it's not the purpose of my column to keep people from eating at Buckhead's (I ate there Sunday - the cheese boulders are all they were cracked up to be and more!).
Robin Garr wrote:Jeremy J wrote:Did you even read my post?
Why in the heck should he do that? He obviously didn't read Marsha's article, either.
Jeremy J wrote:Robin Garr wrote:Jeremy J wrote:Did you even read my post?
Why in the heck should he do that? He obviously didn't read Marsha's article, either.
Also, I don't understand why he has to single out the Hos either...why can't the Bros be included?
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider, Claudebot, Facebook, Google [Bot] and 1 guest