Now I'm really glad we normally grind our own or buy it from a known local supplier.
Steve H wrote:Never buy meat labeled as "ground beef". Instead, select things like "ground sirloin" or "ground chuck". Or better yet, buy grass fed beef from a local farmer.
Steve P wrote:Steve H wrote:Never buy meat labeled as "ground beef". Instead, select things like "ground sirloin" or "ground chuck". Or better yet, buy grass fed beef from a local farmer.
Mmmmmmm....only kinda-sorta-mostly-true. Fact is the Kroger "Ground Beef " that is labeled "Made From Store Trimmings" is probably some of the best and freshest ground beef you'll find in the area. It's typically made from the scraps and trimmings of cuts (like) whole Rib-eye (and other top shelf) roasts. I know...I used to cut it.
Steve H wrote:This is a good tip.
Steve P wrote: I love you guys.
JustinHammond wrote:Steve P wrote: I love you guys.
Are you feeling OK? Maybe a couple Hoptium's have you feeling all sensitive and shit.
Steve P wrote:JustinHammond wrote:Steve P wrote: I love you guys.
Are you feeling OK? Maybe a couple Hoptium's have you feeling all sensitive and shit.
WHOA !!!!!.....Dude. Are you lookin' in my window ?......I am in fact sitting here watching NASCAR qualifying and sipping on my second Hoptimum. So far my fantasy team is sucking in qualifying, so I may have to head head on down and grab numero three-oh. By-the-By...I'll be cracking the seal on a 1/2 bbl of Great Lakes Burning River within the hour. Grab us all couple of dozen wings at Rooties and come on over.
Deb Hall
Foodie
4169
Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:46 pm
Highlands , Louisville
Jeff Cavanaugh wrote:I just want to make sure I understand. Beyond reacting to the not-at-all-slanted term "pink slime," what are people objecting to about this? Is the ammonia treatment dangerous? Or is it just that non-meat portions of the cow are being sold as beef?
Deb Hall wrote: I see nothing positive about this whole process- except saving a few cents per burger.
ABC News has learned the woman who made the decision to OK the mix is a former undersecretary of agriculture, Joann Smith. It was a call that led to hundred of millions of dollars for Beef Products Inc., the makers of pink slime.
When Smith stepped down from the USDA in 1993, BPI’s principal major supplier appointed her to its board of directors, where she made at least $1.2 million over 17 years.
Robin Garr wrote:Deb Hall wrote: I see nothing positive about this whole process- except saving a few cents per burger.
And a few cents per burger, calculated over a bazillion burgers, adds right up. I think this factoid near the end pretty much tells the tale:ABC News has learned the woman who made the decision to OK the mix is a former undersecretary of agriculture, Joann Smith. It was a call that led to hundred of millions of dollars for Beef Products Inc., the makers of pink slime.
When Smith stepped down from the USDA in 1993, BPI’s principal major supplier appointed her to its board of directors, where she made at least $1.2 million over 17 years.
Dan Thomas wrote:Robin Garr wrote:Deb Hall wrote: I see nothing positive about this whole process- except saving a few cents per burger.
And a few cents per burger, calculated over a bazillion burgers, adds right up. I think this factoid near the end pretty much tells the tale:ABC News has learned the woman who made the decision to OK the mix is a former undersecretary of agriculture, Joann Smith. It was a call that led to hundred of millions of dollars for Beef Products Inc., the makers of pink slime.
When Smith stepped down from the USDA in 1993, BPI’s principal major supplier appointed her to its board of directors, where she made at least $1.2 million over 17 years.
Not that I agree with this practice, but the woman only got $70,600 a year serving on the BPI board. That's nothing compared to some of the shenanigans that go on with former Congressmen, Senators, Cabinet Members and people on the Fed board and the money they get after they are finished with their "public service".
That was my exact thought. Its almost like ABC News thinks we cant or wont do the math. They put the $1.2 million total out there and thinks people wont notice the time frame. Same thing happens with sports contract reporting and it drives me crazy.
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider, Claudebot, Google [Bot] and 1 guest