Kim H wrote:I compare it to 'Stewardess' versus 'Flight Attendant'; it's out of date, and too gender-specific. It doesn't necessarily offend me, but it makes my eyes krinkle.
Charles W. wrote:Robin Garr wrote:too gender-specific.
You'll have to make a case why a gender-specific term is inherently problematic or I'll start calling you on using "wife" or "daughter."
Robin Garr wrote:Kim H wrote:too gender-specific.
Vince Yustas wrote:Robin Garr wrote:Kim H wrote:too gender-specific.
I agree with Charles. Sometimes we get just a little too PC. Example: "Chairperson" is the generic head of a committee until the position is actually filled by a living human being. Then the designation is "Chairwoman" or "Chairman" as appropriate.
Robin Garr wrote:Steve Shade wrote:This couldn't be more PC. A waitress is a female. A waiter is a male. So, what's the problem?
Nothing, if you don't mind sounding like your own grandfather. <shrug>
Users browsing this forum: APNIC, Bytespider, Claudebot, Google [Bot] and 7 guests